Skip to comments.
US makes missile defense system operational (Reuters)
Reuters via Yahoo! ^
| Tuesday, June 20, 2006
| Will Dunham
Posted on 06/20/2006 8:13:44 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States has moved its ground-based interceptor missile defense system from test mode to operational amid concerns over an expected North Korean missile launch, a U.S. defense official said on Tuesday.
The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed a Washington Times report that the Pentagon has activated the system, which has been in the developmental stage for years.
"It's good to be ready," the official said.
U.S. officials say evidence such as satellite pictures suggests Pyongyang may have finished fueling a Taepodong-2 missile, which some experts said could reach as far as Alaska.
"There's real caution in how to characterize it so as to not be provocative in our own approach," the defense official said of the move to activate the system.
The Pentagon and State Department have said a North Korean missile launch would be seen as "provocative."
While military officials also note the United States has a limited missile defense system, they have so far declined to comment on any details about the capabilities or potential use of the system to intercept a North Korean missile.
(Additional reporting by Kristin Roberts)
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: miltech; missile; missiledefense; northkorea; operational; pentagon; proliferation; taepodong2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FYI and discussion
"It's good to be ready," the official said.
2
posted on
06/20/2006 8:14:10 AM PDT
by
Momaw Nadon
("...with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.")
To: Momaw Nadon
Jimmy Carter probably just fainted. Mondale, too, after muttering "Freeze Now, Freeze Now..."
To: Momaw Nadon
I think one way or another there will be more countries that have nuclear weapons. Having the missile defense system is a logical path to defend US soil. Negotiations in diplomatic arena should be used only to buy time so that the defense system can be 100% ready.
4
posted on
06/20/2006 8:17:11 AM PDT
by
paudio
(Universal Human Rights and Multiculturalism: Liberals want to have cake and eat it too!)
To: paudio
Wonder at what DEFCON level we are at right now....
5
posted on
06/20/2006 8:19:17 AM PDT
by
Fighting Irish
(Ever find yourself posting messages just to show off your taglines?)
To: Momaw Nadon
6
posted on
06/20/2006 8:20:17 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: Momaw Nadon
The Pentagon and State Department have said a North Korean missile launch would be seen as "provocative." This photo is considered "provacative" in N. Korea and disgusting everywhere else.....
7
posted on
06/20/2006 8:20:51 AM PDT
by
edpc
To: epluribus_2
Too bad we can't make a catapult to fling those two dingbats at incoming missiles.
8
posted on
06/20/2006 8:21:19 AM PDT
by
Hexenhammer
(America for Americans.)
To: Momaw Nadon
If we shoot down the Taepodong, does that make it a No-dong missile?
9
posted on
06/20/2006 8:22:04 AM PDT
by
MediaMole
To: Momaw Nadon
Wonder what action the environmentalist will do on Tiny Kim's intentions?
Guess they would rather see Alaska nuked than allow drilling in Anwar
IMHO, it's not over oil it about destroying the United States of America.
Our alternative oil supply gets nuked, NK, China and Iran join forces and we cut and run in Iraq.
It's good to be ready, but for what end? The DEMS will need a Congressional debate, a review of our defense technology, the position of our antimissile defense system and a detailed report with book before President Bush can decide what to do.
Just like 9/11 it's not about protecting the United States of America, it's about protecting the human rights of other Countries.
10
posted on
06/20/2006 8:22:11 AM PDT
by
not2worry
(What goes around comes around.)
To: paudio
Good old Reagan. It was Providential that he was president and got this thing going. We should get these systems developed and stop wasting precious resources trying to bail out the corrupt, incompetent Latin American governments who are dumping their uneducated huddled masses on us to take care of.
To: MediaMole
12
posted on
06/20/2006 8:24:24 AM PDT
by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: Momaw Nadon
13
posted on
06/20/2006 8:25:59 AM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: Fighting Irish
Want to guess if we are retargeting?
14
posted on
06/20/2006 8:27:05 AM PDT
by
captnorb
To: Momaw Nadon
"Whaaaaat? I Do Nuting Wong! Just Wittle Test"

"I Wuv Maddie Long Time"
To: captnorb
My guess is anything ballistic.
16
posted on
06/20/2006 8:33:03 AM PDT
by
WorkerbeeCitizen
(No guns, No freedom. Any questions)
To: Momaw Nadon
So lets game this a bit. Potential outcomes are...
1) NK doesnt launch
2) NK launches
a) and we shoot it down
b) and we try to shoot it down and miss
c) and we dont try to take it out
What happens to the players in each scenario?
17
posted on
06/20/2006 8:33:43 AM PDT
by
RKV
( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
To: TexasCajun
"I Wuv Maddie Long Time"LOL!!!
Thanks! I'm cleaning the soda off my monitor now.
18
posted on
06/20/2006 8:35:02 AM PDT
by
Momaw Nadon
("...with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.")
To: RKV
Well, for one thing, there's one more potential move in the game that comes to mind:
d) Take out the launch site, possibly in conjunction with a, b, or c.
19
posted on
06/20/2006 8:37:01 AM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: captnorb
Want to guess if we are retargeting?Yes, the real message is not that we are firing up Star Wars, but are sending a message about our capabilities to the nutcakes in NK.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson