[plan2succeed.org]

You said, "The poster has an agenda, he's one of those busybody nanny types who believe that the almighty federal government is the solution to parenting."

You have swerved into the line of personal attack as a method of avoiding the issues, or, as you say, the "BS." And you make "parenting" the central issue again. People will take your personal attacks and methods of avoiding argument into account when they consider how much weight to give to your arguments. That's your loss, not mine.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

You have swerved into the line of personal attack

"Busybody nanny types" is a personal attack? You've got thin skin, fella, because that's normal dialogue here on FR.

as a method of avoiding the issues

Wrong. I didn't "avoid" anything. I've answered all your posts fair and square.

And you make "parenting" the central issue again.

Because your position is indefensible. How do internet library filters via judicial fiat trump the rights of parents/legal guardians?

People will take your personal attacks and methods of avoiding argument into account when they consider how much weight to give to your arguments. That's your loss, not mine.

Ah yes, when losing the argument, resort to saying the other guy is engaging in personal attacks. Typical lib tactic.