Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Diego City Council votes to ban smoking on beaches
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 6/19/06 | AP

Posted on 06/19/2006 6:46:30 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

Cigarette smoking would be banned at city beaches and parks under a measure tentatively approved Monday by the city council.

Sponsors said the measure will reduce litter and allow beachgoers to avoid secondhand smoke.

"To me, this is a quality-of-life issue for San Diego," said Councilman Jim Madaffer, a co-sponsor. "This is an issue that is about public health and safety."

The council unanimously approved the ban. A second vote is required before the measure becomes law.

San Diego, whose miles of beaches are a major tourist draw, joins a handful of other California cities that have similar bans, including Manhattan Beach, Newport Beach, San Francisco, Santa Cruz and Santa Monica.

Violators could be fined, though the amount has not been established.

The city would spend up to $30,000 to put the ban into effect, including signs at beaches and parks, Madaffer said.

Arnold Flick, a retired physician, disputed the health effect of smoking on others.

"There is no ceiling over the people at beaches and parks to trap ambient air," Flick told the council. "There is no data anywhere that shows this kind of exposure is a danger."

Others supported the measure.

"Cigarette butts are the most littered item in the world," Bill Hickman of Surfrider Foundation USA, an environmental group, told the council.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2ndhandsmoke; airpollution; ban; beaches; benhueso; brianmaienschein; california; citycouncil; cleanair; donnafrye; jimmadaffer; kevinfaulconer; nannystate; parks; pufflist; sandiego; scottpeters; smoking; toniatkins; votes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 06/19/2006 6:46:33 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Avoid second hand smoke? At a beach with a constant breeze? That's the biggest load of @#$# I've ever heard of!

Frankly, I hate cigarette smoking, especially in bars. That said, this is outdoors in relatively uncrowded quarters.

No sense at all.


2 posted on 06/19/2006 6:49:26 PM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Sponsors said the measure will reduce litter and allow beachgoers to avoid secondhand smoke.

Litter is ugly, but for second hand smoke reasons... get real.

3 posted on 06/19/2006 6:51:06 PM PDT by onyx (Deport the trolls --- send them back to DU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Some enterprising guy, living on the beach, will charge a small fee to enjoy a smoke in his yard or deck. Hey...I live on the beach.
4 posted on 06/19/2006 6:54:01 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Next Step:

No smoking in your own home

It's for your own good...doncha know.

5 posted on 06/19/2006 6:54:49 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I don't miss the litter. It's hard to fathom the second-hand smoke issue is a concern at San Diego beaches.

At a community park? Perhaps in bleechers or locations with gazebos.

6 posted on 06/19/2006 6:55:02 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Support Arnold-McClintock or embrace higher taxes with Angelides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I hope I never have to go to kalifornistan again as long as I live.


7 posted on 06/19/2006 6:55:28 PM PDT by oldtimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demsux

Actually that should be something that can be prohibited in a rental contract. I suppose it's possible a community may try to ban smoking in your front yard much like drinking in public view has been prohibited in other places regardless if you're sitting on your porch.


8 posted on 06/19/2006 6:56:49 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Support Arnold-McClintock or embrace higher taxes with Angelides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer


San Diego is my home town. I am almost speechless.


9 posted on 06/19/2006 6:58:24 PM PDT by onyx (Deport the trolls --- send them back to DU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

They'd be better off improving the water quality by making sure their waste processing plants are top notch.

What's some butts in the sand compared to, uh, .. yaknow. :-\


10 posted on 06/19/2006 6:58:46 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Wanna help kick some liberal arse? It's not just a job here at FR, IT's an obsession.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I have no problem with this from the littering standpoint, and I'm one of the biggest defenders of smoking on the cigarette threads.

Cigarette butts are everywhere on the beaches. And please, no slippery slope arguments because beaches are public property.

11 posted on 06/19/2006 7:00:17 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Most of the outdoor smoking bans are just silly, but this one may not be such a bad idea. I'd be willing to bet allot of beaches look like ashtrays in certain spots. Of course that can be remedied with enforcing littering violations.


12 posted on 06/19/2006 7:01:15 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I hope every prospective tourist that smokes and was planing to visit San Diego cancels their plans, goes elsewhere and sends a letter stating why to the tourist dept.

Make their decision smart until they repeal it.


13 posted on 06/19/2006 7:04:39 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz; SheLion

Smoke Gnatzies Ping


14 posted on 06/19/2006 7:04:50 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I agree, and I'm a rather heavy smoker that enjoys the beach. I took my 4 year old nephew to Santa Monica and he dug up plenty of butts Ick
15 posted on 06/19/2006 7:05:39 PM PDT by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Just another Joe; CSM; lockjaw02; Publius6961; elkfersupper; nopardons; metesky; ...

I know many of you on this list are not tobacco smokers - but if an article ever deserved a NANNY STATE ping - this is definitely one of them.





(let me know if you want on or off this Nanny State Ping list)


16 posted on 06/19/2006 7:10:49 PM PDT by Gabz (Proud to be a WalMartian --- beep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Ugh! Glad I got outta there after my EAOS was up in the Navy.


17 posted on 06/19/2006 7:15:17 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

OMG yes! And in l.a. county all but 3 beaches will be smoke-free by July 1 (la times). Oh the injustice of it all! Wah!


18 posted on 06/19/2006 7:15:57 PM PDT by at bay ("We actually did an evil....." Eric Scmidt, CEO Google)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress
That said, this is outdoors in relatively uncrowded quarters.

I'm not defending this. But if you consider San Diego's beaches "relatively uncrowded quarters" you've obviously never been to a San Diego beach.

19 posted on 06/19/2006 7:16:28 PM PDT by South40 (Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress

Yes. This is the, "Slippery Slope," we anti smoking ban folks have been talking about.


20 posted on 06/19/2006 7:16:28 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson