Am I attacking? LOL I am just one poster that happens to agree with Mr. Parkers efforts to rid his school of the insidious leftist homosexual activists that wish to take control of childrens moral upbringing away from parents under the false guise of education...
I tend not to take wacko conspiracy theories or those that push them too seriously even when posted on FR and ESPECIALLY when the primary goal objectively has less to do with truth than it does with attempting to vilify a person such as Mr. Parker...
The facts seem simple enough here -David Parkers son was beaten up and David Parker feels it is related to his efforts to oppose the homosexual agenda -big woop!
You do not see but a few running around with their heads exploding over this earth shattering news because it is not really earth shattering news...
Setting aside Mr. Parkers thoughts, at worst IF the "conservative news" side of the story is completely true at most it disparages unnamed homosexual activist parents and their children -again, big woop!
When I read such nonsense posted as justification to villify Mr. Parker repeatedly in a spammer like fashion on ever article posted on FR on this subject I do not see crusaders for truth here attempting to rescue me from lies -I see a few trolls some familiar from other homosexual agenda topic discussions that in this case are frantically attempting yet failing to control information they wish they could censor but can not and as such now feel driven to spin.
I can figure out what and who to believe all on my own thank you...
You've told freepers who don't agree with your position to take a hike. This isn't your forum and it's not your thread.
You tend to not take conspiracy theories too seriously? LOL. One would never know it from reading your posts.
And you're quite the riot talking about spam. You've posted this story just how many times now? Dozens.
Then a few of us come along with our own links which shows that Parker wasn't really arrested because he objected to homosexual material being taught his son but rather because he refused to leave the school when the meeting was over.
And I see you have absolutely no answers to the more realistic questions a few of us have had.
Why didn't Parker file a police report for several weeks? Why didn't Parker take his son to a hospital to see if he had internal injuries from this "mob" that attacked him? Why did he permit his son to visit the home of the boy who presumably attacked him? Why hasn't Parker opened a complaint with Children's Services and the DA?
Why should we believe one word he says? He's permitting so much misinformation to be spread it's become an urban legend. That suits his agenda just fine. It's not a bad agenda, but using a child to further it is disgusting. And possibly dangerous to the child.
;) Great job, as always! It's nice to see the voice of reason, especially on these threads.