[MNJohnnie]

Whaaa! Bush isn't doing ONLY what I want! Whaaaa! Same old same old, repeated endlessly.

Have fun being completely politically irrelevant the rest of your lives. Life requires compromise. HERE is what happens when you all indulge in this sort of feverish 100%erism.

Ok, you "break" with the Republicans because YOU personally are not getting ONLY 100% of ONLY what YOU personally want. So wander off with the rest of the whiners and form your own group. Let's call it the "Real American Party"

So you all feel peachy until suddenly Issue Such and such comes up. Well suddenly some of you have ONE side and the some the other. So what happens. Same thing, "You are betraying me, I hate you, Whaaa!" and you splinter into the "Real American Party" the the "Ultra Real American Party" and then issue B and the Ultra Reals suddenly split with the Ultra Conservative Real American party forming and so on and so on and so on and so forth until it you and 6 of your relatives sitting around telling each other how great it is you all are so ideologically pure!

You will be completely irrelevant and get 100% of NOTHING politically but, boy, you can all sit around Freeper and pat each other on the back about how dogmatically pure you are. Whee will that not be some fun! Irrelevant but Pure. There is a catchy slogan for your "third party"!

To be effective at anything in life, but especially politics, requires the ability to build a coalition. NONE of you fanatic 100%er seem willing to grasp that basic fact.

[kellynla]

hey genius!
do you even bother to read posts addressed to you

TAKE ME OFF YOUR PING LIST!

[Fawn]

Why does he bother to fight the war on terror when they can just cross the border so easily? With a water, bread and a welcome mat. Seems hypocritical.

[Altura Ct.]

And you are the type who will compromise on everything so that eventually you have nothing. Some things are not up for compromise. Integrity, WOT, The life of my children, American sovereignty, That which has been passed down for our protection to pass down to our posterity and been protected with the blood of our/my ancestors and patriots.

[pgyanke]

Buzz off and don't ping me again.

[Richard-SIA]

Say, is that mile wide broad brush really easy to lift?

Your wild shotgun reply missed!

Which of my post were you replying too?

I do not see where you get off with the "100% my way" BS, and you have NO IDEA what all I do for the republican party.

Stop being lazy, if you have a point to make, directed at my post, reply in specific terms.

[tumblindice]

I read the latest National Review magazine yesterday evening, and a very good pro-law enforcement/`secure our southwestern border' article stated that when George W. Bush was running for TX governor, he had a political ad that said:
"So he's not a Democrat. So what?" The ad was in Spanish.
I'll vote for any conservative--or any candidate for that matter, e.g. Sen. Nelson--who pledges to enforce our laws and secure our borders, and I don't want to have to `Press 1 for English' in the booth.
At least on this issue, what's the worst that can happen? So a Democrat/RINO/CINO is elected and s/he fails to enforce our immigration laws or secure our borders, and supports amnesty. Weeeell, that's what the administration is doing (or failing to do) now.
The `monster-in-the-closet' argument is just that, it doesn't carry any weight. We'll make ourselves "irrelevant"?
Ask the voters of South Dakota and Tom Daschle about that . . .

[Little Ray]

100% would be a wall on the border with heavily armed quick reaction forces waiting for invaders.
100% would be round-the-clock trains and planes with armed guards running the interlopers to transit camps then out of the country.
100% would be cutting off all illegals from all forms of welfare.
100% would be laughing in their face when they insist on paying "instate" tuition.
100% would be compensating folks living on the border for the damage the invaders do.
100% would be helicopter gunships patrolling for any Mexican "military" that tries to force the wall, or otherwise help invaders, and hot pursuit of the survivors to wherever they hide in Mexico.
100% would be putting an end to anchor babies, and preventing them from being citizens by birth.

All we want is the border secured to prevent the tidal waves of invaders that any discussion of amnesty causes. Once the border is secure, they can discuss other options, like guest workers and amnesties.

IF wanting 'Pubbie politicos to do the right thing makes me irrelevant, fine. I've done my job, cast my vote. They can go look to our future "citizens" for their vote. I'm sure they'll be appropriately grateful.

[Texas Federalist]

Whaaa!

Nice. Getting the infamous MNJohnnie "Whaaa" response is always a treat, but it rarely comes but one ironic post after you accuse others of throwing temper tantrums. Make sure you keep me on your ping list. You are endless entertainment. P.S. I just did a web search on MNJohnnie and "Waaa" and got four pages of results from freerepublic. (http://search.yahoo.com/search?ei=UTF-8&p=Whaaa+MNJohnnie&xargs=0&pstart=1&fr=sfp&dups=1)

Kudos! I have not seen such dedication to one argument over such an extended period of time and over so many different issues since elementary school when little Brian Kelley bested the playground in argument after argument with his notorious ". . . so's your face" retort.

[Vaquero]

ya gotta stop drinking it Johnnie!

[APFel]

Wow. Calling those you disagree with a whole batch of names.

You sure are a skilled rhetorician.

APf

[itsahoot]

NONE of you fanatic 100%er seem willing to grasp that basic fact.

Well Jesus said it best, and GW used it himself. You are eithe with me or against me. I believe that He is a 100%er.