I'm matching Ann petty for petty.
If she was a liberal with all those credentials and the tables were reversed, you'd be rippin' her a new one for being one of those 'egghead' libs.
I think it's funny.
She's a pit bull, but she's on our side, so we're going to pretend she's a yorkie.
Fair enough. :)
If she was a liberal with all those credentials and the tables were reversed, you'd be rippin' her a new one for being one of those 'egghead' libs.
Nah, liberals are easy to attack based on what they try to present as facts, and the inconsistencies in what they say.
I think it's funny.
I definitely agree. I don't always agree with how she says things, and sometimes I don't even agree with what she says. But watching others react to what she says is almost always funny.
She's a pit bull, but she's on our side, so we're going to pretend she's a yorkie.
I seems to me that it's gotten harder and harder to see distinct sides in most political debates. Maybe it's always been that way and I've just become more aware of it.
One of the things I really like about Coulter is that she grabs onto truly important issues that cut to the core of our society, shoves them into people's faces, and makes people talk about them rather than talk around them as politicians often do.
She pulls an issue into the spotlight, backs her point up with a lot of facts, and isn't afraid to defend her points publicly.
If even a 10% of the coverage and discussion covers the facts, it ends up being far more informative that most political discussions, and by simply seeing who is unwilling to debate the facts we learn a lot.
That doesn't even take into account the entertainment value. :)