Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wurlitzer

Itr should be noted that the options pertain to the *accused*, who is presumed innocent. One hopes that
you never find yourself falsely accused and in a position
to need these protections.


78 posted on 06/19/2006 6:34:22 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: rahbert
"Itr should be noted that the options pertain to the *accused*, who is presumed innocent. One hopes that you never find yourself falsely accused and in a position to need these protections."

You might have missed my intent. It was not to dismiss wrong doing on the part of government slugs but to hold the actual slug more accountable rather than punish the taxpayer by letting the accused avoid a fair trial. Defense lawyers define a fair trial as one where the accused gets off. A right to a fair trial has been perverted into a right to use loopholes to get a get out of jail free card.

If, for example, a search was improper yet highly damning evidence was found, we currently exclude the evidence and issue a get out of jail free card instead of including the evidence and issuing a stiff penalty to those who committed the violation of the 4th Amendment.

The legal system is no longer about justice but about keeping lawyers in business.

I am currently in a 3 way lawyer milking fest because of a bad General contractor, a crappy Subcontractor and I have to pay a scum bag lawyer just to get the job done as contracted. Gee the bastard lawyers push for contracts then charge the innocent party to enforce them.

87 posted on 06/19/2006 7:32:45 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (The difference between democrats and terrorists is the terrorists don't claim to support the troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson