Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mike70

Nucs have to be near a water source.


17 posted on 06/18/2006 6:51:52 PM PDT by rottndog (WOOF!!!!--Keep your "compassion" away from my wallet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: rottndog

There are actually several rivers which could be used for that purpose in each of the states mentioned


22 posted on 06/18/2006 7:06:58 PM PDT by mike70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: rottndog
"Nucs have to be near a water source."

No, actually they don't. It's just a lot cheaper to build a once-through water heat exchanger than it is to build a closed-loop air heat exchanger.

28 posted on 06/18/2006 7:58:47 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: rottndog
Nucs have to be near a water source.

The Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station where I work is 40 miles west of Phoenix with no lakes or rivers nearby (the Hassayampa River is within 5 miles, but it's dry). The cooling water for the plant comes from the 91st Avenue water treatment plant in Phoenix. It's piped about 35 miles to the plant, cleaned up, and supplied to the evaporative cooling towers. I think it's the only nuclear plant in the country that's not adjacent to a lake, a river, or the ocean.

35 posted on 06/18/2006 9:19:55 PM PDT by Tarantulas ( Illegal immigration - the trojan horse that's treated like a sacred cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson