Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGovernment

Conversely--and more critically--we mustn't become the unwitting victims of the clintons, the Left and their flim flam.

We must resist splitting our vote, AT ALL COSTS.

We must realize that splitting the Right will be their strategy. As a minority party, they cannot win, (especially if they run someone as repulsive as clinton), without splitting us with either a Perot or an issue that will function like a Perot to keep some voters home.


32 posted on 06/18/2006 6:02:02 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Mia T
We must resist splitting our vote, AT ALL COSTS.

Agreed. So let's nominate someone who will not split the right, rather than John McCain.
34 posted on 06/18/2006 6:03:32 PM PDT by AntiGovernment (A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
Spliting a parties votes with third party candidates does not always work.

Yes Teddy Roosevelt did elect Woodrow Wilson.

Robert LaFollette was not a factor in the 1920s either. The Democrats did not win but the republican always got more votes than the Democrats and Progessive party combined.

Strom Thurman could not defeat Harry Truman.

However in 1968 George Wallace may have elected Richard Nixon.

In 1980 John Anderson could not defeat Ronald Reagan.

Perot claims to have defeated Bush Sr. in 1992 and Dole in 1996.

In 2000,Pat Buchanan could not defeat W Bush.

Third party candidates are a mixed bag. Sometimes they work and sometimes they do not.

With rare exceptions third party candidates draw voters that normally do not vote at all. These are the people who do not see a nickels worth of difference between Republicans and Democrats. When they don't have a third party candidate to vote for those that do vote tend to split their votes between the Republican and Democratic candidated. Think about it.. If you genuinely think there is not a dimes worth of difference, how would you vote?.. Flip a coin?

47 posted on 06/18/2006 6:22:08 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T; AntiGovernment

I have to respectfully, but adamantly, disagree with your conclusions.

If the GOP puts up a candidate who is Democrat light, why in the world should I be obligated to vote for that person?

The GOP doesn't own my vote and when they put up lousy candidates and pass lousy and unconstitutional laws, they do not even have my interests in mind.

Do I want the Dems? Hell no. But it is the nice republicans who are making socialism acceptable in this country. Every time the vile and nasty Democrats push too hard and too far, the American people smack them down. Then we get a compassionate conservative who does what the Dems couldn't do. They do it piecemeal and get applauded for it.

No thanks. No more RINOs. They'll kill us faster than the Dems.


70 posted on 06/18/2006 6:57:48 PM PDT by Badray (CFR my ass. There's not too much money in politics. There's too much money in government hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson