Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B.O. Plenty
Actually, there is a third way. A realistic way. We do it with unemployment numbers. When we reach around 95% employment, we declare that to be "full" employment, given that there are around 5% who either can't or won't work.

When it comes to drugs, we need to admit that there will be a certain number of people who are going to use drugs no matter what we do. As with unemployment, we need to pick a number -- say 5%.

When we reach that number we declare victory then spend only enough each year to maintain that number.

299 posted on 06/21/2006 12:51:23 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
You know my 1st way would never be implemented under any circumstances, and should not be...but...no offense, legalization is realistic.

We would have to deal with druggies as we do now with drunks. Some druggies function well just as some drunks function well right now. The rest have to go to a drying facility...and if that fails, they go onto the streets. They used to go to hospitals and sanatoriums until the libs declared that holding drunks in those kinds of places was somehow a violation of their rights. So they live on the streets.

I don't think that there would be so many people doing drugs after legalization as many think. I don't know one person who would go out and do a line of cocaine if it suddenly became legal, and I bet most people here don't know anyone who would either.

305 posted on 06/21/2006 1:11:38 PM PDT by B.O. Plenty (Islam, liberalism and abortions are terminal..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson