Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurker; Fred Nerks
Lurker...I think you meant post 49. I already addressed that and no, I am not wrong.

Fred....I did not say that I was. You point to one source and say it must be jihad. Yes, Muhammad belonged to NOI and other militant Islamic groups. That, related to his crime, was incidental. Considering you are half a world away from what happened and Muhammad was captured at the I-70 rest stop miles from my home, I am a much more authoritative source than any you'll find on Google, or whatever.

Now....both of you pay attention.

When has a jihadist ever pulled off some sort of stunt and not taken the opportunity to praise the cause, mention Allah, or espouse Islamic rhetoric? NONE OF THIS HAPPENED IN THE COURSE OF THE SHOOTINGS.

I'll say it again, since I know of all the posters I have addressed, I am the ONLY ONE OF THE SIX INVOLVED that is an actual resident of the immediate area where this occurred. I watched the daily briefings by Chief Moose. I sat in the traffic jams on I-270 and I-495 while police searched cars for the wrong person. Not one time, in any of the letters left at the crime scene, did Muhammad or Malvo espouse any Islamic rhetoric in relation to the crimes. As I said before, the authorities were looking for a lone, white male in his 30's. That is not exactly your typical jihadist.

The motives for Muhammad's actions were made perfectly clear during his trial. While it is true he practices Islam, that was not his prime motivation in the snipings, as it was not in the robbery/murder in the convenience store on his way to the MD area. He was an opportunist and jumped on the Islamoterrorist bandwagon of the times. He wanted to seem more important and relevant to events than he was. Your ignorance in this matter only fuels a fallacy.

75 posted on 06/17/2006 6:36:32 PM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: edpc
"Your ignorance in this matter only fuels a fallacy."

And you come across like a member of the jury who bought the explanation from the psychologists who tried to explain Malvo's actions as being due to his fascination with the movie, The Matrix.

Islam had nothing to do with it?

Don't put me down because I am an Australian. Geography has nothing to do with this. The muslims are doing their best to convert our aboriginals and turn them against us. The indigenous people are considered to be useful idiots by islam...as are your coloured minority.

"Yes, Muhammad belonged to NOI and other militant Islamic groups. That, related to his crime, was incidental..."

LOL!

82 posted on 06/17/2006 6:55:17 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Read the bio THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free! Click Fred Nerks for link to my Page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: edpc
So you're saying that your proximity to the events in question somehow makes you an expert on the motivations of the killers? Is that about right?

L

89 posted on 06/17/2006 7:12:56 PM PDT by Lurker (When decadence pervades the corridors of power, depravity walks the side streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: edpc
I am the ONLY ONE OF THE SIX INVOLVED that is an actual resident of the immediate area where this occurred. I watched the daily briefings by Chief Moose. I sat in the traffic jams on I-270 and I-495 while police searched cars for the wrong person. Not one time, in any of the letters left at the crime scene, did Muhammad or Malvo espouse any Islamic rhetoric in relation to the crimes.

You are not the only one that lives in the proximate area to where all the shootings occurred. I remembered the Chief Moose briefs as well. Quite well.

I remember being enraged that the presumption by the local media and others was "white male driving a white panel van." How the W$%&^ could they know that?

132 posted on 06/18/2006 3:31:20 AM PDT by sauropod ("Heaven on my left, Hell on my right and the Angel of Death behind me" - Dune)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: edpc; Fred Nerks

Your ignorance in this matter only fuels a fallacy.

You should've listened to your own advice. That ba$tard attended the same mosque as Assan Akbar. He was the same sob who fragged his own officers during the 2nd GW. THE SAME MOSQUE...no connection to islam my a$$. They churn out militant jihadi's at that terrorist training facility in Baton Rouge, but according to someone who sat in traffic...and....gasp...had to endure a specialized moment that made them an expert....there's no connection.

You're no authority at all.


154 posted on 06/18/2006 10:19:28 AM PDT by bayouranger (The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices the lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson