Oh my God...choosing who the child will be before he (or she) is even born. Choosing what kind of child gets to BE born. Eliminating potential 'weirdness' (aka, the unique characteristics that makes everyone unique).
The world is going down the crapper even faster.
To: DBeers; little jeremiah; mhking; Jim Robinson; darkangel82; Victoria Delsoul; Allegra; fanfan; ...
Moral Absolutes/Canada/OMG ping.
2 posted on
06/17/2006 4:14:04 PM PDT by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Conservatives teach you how to fish. Liberals give you the fish by stealing it from the fisherman.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
One company in Northern VA will only permit the sex section if and only if the couple has one baby of a opposite sex.
3 posted on
06/17/2006 4:15:00 PM PDT by
Perdogg
To: DBeers; little jeremiah; mhking; Jim Robinson; darkangel82; Victoria Delsoul; Allegra; fanfan; ...
Moral Absolutes/Canada/OMG ping.
4 posted on
06/17/2006 4:15:21 PM PDT by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Conservatives teach you how to fish. Liberals give you the fish by stealing it from the fisherman.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
5 posted on
06/17/2006 4:15:31 PM PDT by
satchmodog9
(Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
7 posted on
06/17/2006 4:17:59 PM PDT by
Clock King
("How will it end?" - Emperor; "In Fire." - Kosh)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
American soil — where it's legal
Sorry, but I disagree. If a couple really have their heart set on a boy or a girl, and they have the $$ to make their dream come true, fine by me.
10 posted on
06/17/2006 4:27:18 PM PDT by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll. 17,406+ snide replies and counting!)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Just killing the babies the rest of the world doesn't want to kill.
12 posted on
06/17/2006 4:57:55 PM PDT by
MrEdd
(I would have gotten away with it too - if it weren't for those meddling kids and their stupid dog.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
So why is this an issue with (p)MSNBC? If the couple wanted to come to the US to have an abortion, they would be hailed as heroes!
Yet another indication of the MSM's pro-death bias.
To: Ultra Sonic 007
From what I have read, gender selection is ONLY available in the US for couples who already have a child of one gender and for inherited genetic disorders.
You can't just go and say you want a boy or a girl for your first child. The purpose is for family balancing.
I don't see what the problem is if a couple already has several of one gender and wants to complete their family with a child of the other gender. As long as no embyros are destroyed.
15 posted on
06/17/2006 5:16:49 PM PDT by
Reddy
(America, Bless God!)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Oh my God...choosing who the child will be before he (or she) is even born. I think this is a good thing IMHO.
16 posted on
06/17/2006 5:23:45 PM PDT by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
People will be less alarmed as sex selection becomes more routine
of course- people used to be shocked at all sorts of things that are commonplace and accepted nowadays.
The client decides whether unused embryos will be frozen, donated for research or destroyed.
Hmmm. More "extra" embryos. Be sure and don't call them babies.
...you're getting a doctor to mix it together and put it back in. ... We're not messing around with God the creator.
Not exactly.
20 posted on
06/17/2006 6:00:10 PM PDT by
visualops
(If you build it... www.visualops.com ...they won't come. Build the fence!)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Who put the "homosexual agenda" keyword? That sort of stuff messes up the keyword searches.
21 posted on
06/17/2006 6:01:06 PM PDT by
visualops
(If you build it... www.visualops.com ...they won't come. Build the fence!)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Cheapening of Life continues. What kind of a man wants their child to be conceived via a test tube anyway (assuming there are no fertility problems that make it necessary)?
To: Ultra Sonic 007
If people were sorting out gay gened babies, I guarantee the media take on this would be totally different.
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Hitler dreamed of things like this.
What sick, Godless world. This is what too much money can do to people......
26 posted on
06/17/2006 7:13:40 PM PDT by
Finalapproach29er
(Americans need to remember Osama's "strong horse" -"weak horse" analogy. Let's stop acting weak.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
The people running these fertility clinics are reactionary scum, and should bne sued for hate crimes.
Imagine, in this day and age, claiming to offer "sex selection", and only giving two choices.
To: Ultra Sonic 007
What's wrong with parents wanting to choose the gender of their children? I went to the webside of
The Fertility Institutes, the company mentioned in the article, and they are offering 99.99% accurate gender selection for only $18.5 thousand. That's a pretty reasonable price for an almost certain outcome.
If parents want to balance their families, and are willing to pay the several hundred thousand dollars it takes these days to raise a child through college, then the cost of gender selection constitutes a small fraction of that total cost.
32 posted on
06/17/2006 10:39:34 PM PDT by
dpwiener
To: Ultra Sonic 007; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; BIRDS; ...
MORAL ABSOLUTES PINGDISCUSSION ABOUT:
Wealthy couples head to U.S. to pick baby's sex
Soon we will be at a point where the eugenicists are killing dozens of embryos for every birth.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be included in or removed from the MORAL ABSOLUTES PINGLIST, please FReepMail wagglebee.
37 posted on
06/18/2006 12:04:27 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
