Skip to comments.
Wealthy couples head to U.S. to pick baby's sex (MEGA BARF ALERT)
MSNBC ^
| 06/14/2006
| AP
Posted on 06/17/2006 4:12:36 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Oh my God...choosing who the child will be before he (or she) is even born. Choosing what kind of child gets to BE born. Eliminating potential 'weirdness' (aka, the unique characteristics that makes everyone unique).
The world is going down the crapper even faster.
To: DBeers; little jeremiah; mhking; Jim Robinson; darkangel82; Victoria Delsoul; Allegra; fanfan; ...
Moral Absolutes/Canada/OMG ping.
2
posted on
06/17/2006 4:14:04 PM PDT
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Conservatives teach you how to fish. Liberals give you the fish by stealing it from the fisherman.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
One company in Northern VA will only permit the sex section if and only if the couple has one baby of a opposite sex.
3
posted on
06/17/2006 4:15:00 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
To: DBeers; little jeremiah; mhking; Jim Robinson; darkangel82; Victoria Delsoul; Allegra; fanfan; ...
Moral Absolutes/Canada/OMG ping.
4
posted on
06/17/2006 4:15:21 PM PDT
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Conservatives teach you how to fish. Liberals give you the fish by stealing it from the fisherman.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
5
posted on
06/17/2006 4:15:31 PM PDT
by
satchmodog9
(Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
So which list am I on? Moral Absolutes, Canada, or OMG?
Seriously though, this is sick and unreal.
To: Ultra Sonic 007
7
posted on
06/17/2006 4:17:59 PM PDT
by
Clock King
("How will it end?" - Emperor; "In Fire." - Kosh)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: darkangel82
I just said OMG to get my general feeling across to those I was pinging. It's not necessarily a ping list.
But you know...the first thing that came to mind when reading this was Nazi Germany. You know, their euthanization of the elderly and the sick?
This 'prebirth sex change' parallels that situation IMO, for some reason. Anybody else thinking that?
9
posted on
06/17/2006 4:22:35 PM PDT
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Conservatives teach you how to fish. Liberals give you the fish by stealing it from the fisherman.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
American soil — where it's legal
Sorry, but I disagree. If a couple really have their heart set on a boy or a girl, and they have the $$ to make their dream come true, fine by me.
10
posted on
06/17/2006 4:27:18 PM PDT
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll. 17,406+ snide replies and counting!)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
I was just being a smart a** to try and bring some humor to a very serious thread, but I agree, that's exactly what I was thinking.
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Just killing the babies the rest of the world doesn't want to kill.
12
posted on
06/17/2006 4:57:55 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(I would have gotten away with it too - if it weren't for those meddling kids and their stupid dog.)
To: Aikona
Roughly equal number of males and females is necessary for social stability.Huh? What about the decline in male population during and after a war? Is your statement based upon any evidence or did you just make it up?
To: Ultra Sonic 007
So why is this an issue with (p)MSNBC? If the couple wanted to come to the US to have an abortion, they would be hailed as heroes!
Yet another indication of the MSM's pro-death bias.
To: Ultra Sonic 007
From what I have read, gender selection is ONLY available in the US for couples who already have a child of one gender and for inherited genetic disorders.
You can't just go and say you want a boy or a girl for your first child. The purpose is for family balancing.
I don't see what the problem is if a couple already has several of one gender and wants to complete their family with a child of the other gender. As long as no embyros are destroyed.
15
posted on
06/17/2006 5:16:49 PM PDT
by
Reddy
(America, Bless God!)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Oh my God...choosing who the child will be before he (or she) is even born. I think this is a good thing IMHO.
16
posted on
06/17/2006 5:23:45 PM PDT
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: Aikona
Oh, Geez... that's all we need.
Chinese jihadists.
To: Aikona
"Young males without the possibility to find a mate are a volatile group of people, to say the least."
Not that our dear allies could *POSSIBLY* be planning any adventures in which a few hundred million units of unwed/never to be wed cannon fodder could be useful.... /sarc
18
posted on
06/17/2006 5:46:24 PM PDT
by
RedStateRocker
(Nuke Mecca, deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, ATF and DEA.)
To: Aikona
They just need to go to Canada where apparently all the women will be ;^)
19
posted on
06/17/2006 5:55:27 PM PDT
by
visualops
(If you build it... www.visualops.com ...they won't come. Build the fence!)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
People will be less alarmed as sex selection becomes more routine
of course- people used to be shocked at all sorts of things that are commonplace and accepted nowadays.
The client decides whether unused embryos will be frozen, donated for research or destroyed.
Hmmm. More "extra" embryos. Be sure and don't call them babies.
...you're getting a doctor to mix it together and put it back in. ... We're not messing around with God the creator.
Not exactly.
20
posted on
06/17/2006 6:00:10 PM PDT
by
visualops
(If you build it... www.visualops.com ...they won't come. Build the fence!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
