Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
the important thing was to get an injunction against the unconstitutional policy. A mere withdrawal of the policy at that point would have accomplished nothing, and the legal fees would still have been awarded. There was no way to stop that.

I don't think so. If the district court had dismissed the case as moot, the plaintiffs wouldn't be considered a "prevailing party" and therefore wouldn't be eligible for attorney's fees.

40 posted on 06/17/2006 5:04:29 PM PDT by Sandy ("You show me a nation without partisanship, and I'll show you a tyranny.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Sandy
The award of attorney fees flows from the civil rights act under which the complaint was filed: 42 U.S. Code, Section 1983. A related section, 42 U.S. Code, Section 1988, provides for fees in such cases and leaves it up to the court's discretion.
41 posted on 06/17/2006 6:03:00 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson