To: PatrickHenry
the important thing was to get an injunction against the unconstitutional policy. A mere withdrawal of the policy at that point would have accomplished nothing, and the legal fees would still have been awarded. There was no way to stop that.I don't think so. If the district court had dismissed the case as moot, the plaintiffs wouldn't be considered a "prevailing party" and therefore wouldn't be eligible for attorney's fees.
40 posted on
06/17/2006 5:04:29 PM PDT by
Sandy
("You show me a nation without partisanship, and I'll show you a tyranny.")
To: Sandy
41 posted on
06/17/2006 6:03:00 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson