Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks

Just a follow up -

Dosen't it bother you in the least that in order for your source to attempt to prove it's points it has to provide false,edited and missleading "quotes" ?

Isn't that kind of Michael Morre-ish ?


50 posted on 06/18/2006 8:03:57 PM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: RS

"Dosen't it bother you in the least that in order for your source to attempt to prove it's points it has to provide false,edited and missleading "quotes" ?"

'False, edited and missleading quotes' ARE YOUR CONTENTION. The whole world is trying to fathom where it all went wrong...was it right from the beginning from the mouth of mohammad or was the evil inserted as time went by:

http://www.corkscrew-balloon.com/02/03/1bkk/04b.html

SCHOLARS SCRUTINIZE THE KORAN'S ORIGIN:

SNIPPED.

"Between fear and political correctness, it's not possible to say anything other than sugary nonsense about Islam," said one scholar at an American university who asked not to be named, referring to the threatened violence as well as the widespread reluctance on United States college campuses to criticize other cultures.

While scriptural interpretation may seem like a remote and innocuous activity, close textual study of Jewish and Christian scripture played no small role in loosening the Church's domination on the intellectual and cultural life of Europe, and paving the way for unfettered secular thought. "The Muslims have the benefit of hindsight of the European experience, and they know very well that once you start questioning the holy scriptures, you don't know where it will stop," the scholar explained.

The touchiness about questioning the Koran predates the latest rise of Islamic militancy. As long ago as 1977, John Wansbrough of the School of Oriental and African Studies in London wrote that subjecting the Koran to "analysis by the instruments and techniques of biblical criticism is virtually unknown."

Mr. Wansbrough insisted that the text of the Koran appeared to be a composite of different voices or texts compiled over dozens if not hundreds of years. After all, scholars agree that there is no evidence of the Koran until 691 — 59 years after Muhammad's death — when the Dome of the Rock mosque in Jerusalem was built, carrying several Koranic inscriptions.

These inscriptions differ to some degree from the version of the Koran that has been handed down through the centuries, suggesting, scholars say, that the Koran may have still been evolving in the last decade of the seventh century. Moreover, much of what we know as Islam — the lives and sayings of the Prophet — is based on texts from between 130 and 300 years after Muhammad's death.

ISLAM, YOU HAVE A PROBLEM!


53 posted on 06/18/2006 8:36:36 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Read the bio THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free! Click Fred Nerks for link to my Page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson