The Coulter attackers are honing
in on ONE SENTENCE, entirely dismissing
the preceding sentences of the paragraph,
which is the meat of the chapter. But
then, the MSM do this all the time!
"I've never seen people enjoying their
husband's deaths so much" is the
summation of the paragraph. Now, you
may disagree with her that these women
are posing as poster gals for the DNC.
But Coulter is correct when she says
they are not only cleaning up financially,
they ARE ENJOYING a You-Can't-Touch-Me status
because of their widowhood. Her point is,
they weren't the ONLY widows involved in 9/11.
Like Cindy Sheehan, they get a pass at saying
anything they damn well please for the DNC, or
should we say in their case, what the DNC pays
them to say. Does anyone in their right mind
think Cindy Sheehan had the money to travel
all over the country and down to South Amerlca?
Like the Jersey Gals, she was financed. THAT
puts all of them in a Spokesman class, and their
statements open for debate. Coulter is not
denying they have a right to speak their minds
about security, etc.; just that they don't
have the right to expect to be "above the fray"
of criticism like the others making political
statements.
It's revealing that you don't respond to those who answer your original question directly, and correctly.
I see the same thing over at the DUmmies site, intentional ignorance.
Surely you're not leading a double life?
The whole point of what Ann was saying is that those widows who support the dimwits agenda in any way are allowed to spew their venom and are not to be criticized in any way since they are 'grieving widows'.