Replies

Here is the record in one post:

Zon: The Playboy comment was obviously meant as a means to extricate himself from the hole he (she?) had dug.
Good for you. See tag line.144 to 137

Below is when ahayes engaged Zon in discussion on this thread.

ahayes: What, you weren't aware that Ann Coulter said that? 146 to 144ahayes: Here you go:
"Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy." -- Ann Coulter, Godless
Having read your tagline, I'll await an apology. 151 to 144
Zon: I know exactly what Ann wrote. In your 146 post you jumped to the wrong assumption that I didn't know what Ann wrote. Now you've compounded your error.
I'm waiting for you to admit your error of jumping to the wrong conclusion and then compounding your error. I need no apology from you. Nor do I want an apology from you because it would be meaningless.
My tag line holds it's ground. Always. You did it to yourself. 158 to 151

Below is where ahayes misdirects the discussion. He knows full well that he made a wrong assumption in post 146 and compounded his error in his post 151. Nor does he acknowledge his error and asking me for an apology despite, it is he -- by his own standards (as well as my tagline) -- that owes me an apology.

ahayes: If you knew that she made the Playboy comment, then I really have no clue what your initial post meant, but I can't say I'm concerned with the opinion of someone so complacent about vulgarity. 161 to 158

Below I return the discussion back on track to The Point that ahayes made.

Zon: I pointed out your wrong assumption which you next compounded that error. Then I asked you to correct your error. I take note that you chose to ignore acknowledging your error, much less make any attempt to correct it. You just carry on as if nothing happened.
Yo dude, your credibility just took a considerable hit. It didn't have to be that way. You chose it that way. But hey, that's your problem -- not mine. Deal with it. Or don't. It doesn't matter to me -- it's your loss, not mine.
There's no escape. See tag line.182 to 161
ahayes: Yo, dude, until you explain your original post, I can't even figure out what my error was, dude!

That is so disingenuous of you. Your146 post your assumption that I didn't know what AC wrote was in error. I pointed that error out to you in my 158 post. And you compounded that error in your 151 by repeating your erroneous assumption and then asked for my apology. Commenting that you had read my tagline.

You claim you don't understand my original post (144) yet earlier in your 151 post to it you ask for my apology. How is it that you ask for an apology when you don't understand the post? Asking for an apology because you read my tagline. So far you have been anything but honest on this matter.

Here... allow me take the shovel away from you and toss you a rope: see tagline.