Considering you think it is acceptable to accuse someone of "enjoying" a loved one's death, then quibble about the meaning of "enjoy", and then give tacit approval to vulgar suggestions about another's sexual morals, I'm rather glad I don't fit you criteria for "intellectual honesty."
you = your
Ah, yes, to "quibble"
Definitions of quibble on the Web:
- petty argument; nit-picking. After some underhanded golf shenanigans in The Dentist, Fields tells his partner not to "quibble" about it. www.louisville.edu/~kprayb01/WCWords.html
- evade the truth of a point or question by raising irrelevant objections
- an evasion of the point of an argument by raising irrelevant distinctions or objections
- argue over petty things; "Let's not quibble over pennies" wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
So, the actual meanings of words don't matter to you or the debate, so long as you are emotionally "on the right side?" The rational of the hopeless liberal. We have now established you intellectual bona fides.
and then give tacit approval to vulgar suggestions about another's sexual morals,
No, I just chose to ignore your idiotic attempt to divert from the "inconvenient truth," as your sainted AlGore would say.
I'm rather glad I don't fit you criteria for "intellectual honesty."
You don't know the meaning of "is," let alone either "intellectual" or "honesty."
I repeat, you are dismisseed.
You are also now completely discredited, debunked, deflated, exploded, punctured and otherwise proved wrong.
You never engaged the argument, therefore you concede the argument. You lose.