Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

3 escape murder charges in carjacking death of toddler (Update)
Houston Chronicle ^ | June 17, 2006, 1:12AM | ARMANDO VILLAFRANCA

Posted on 06/17/2006 4:14:34 AM PDT by cbkaty

Harris County prosecutors decided to file aggravated robbery charges in a deadly carjacking because the evidence did not show the attackers intended to kill a little girl, a key element for a murder charge, officials said.

"It doesn't sound like a serious enough charge — maybe that is what people's perception is," said Di Glaeser, chief of the major offender and special crimes unit of the Harris County District Attorney's Office. "I think, that if these people are guilty, they should receive the most serious punishment and that would be aggravated robbery."

Charged with aggravated robbery were Bakari Holland, 18; Koty Holmes, 19, and Rashard Renfro, 23. Holland also was charged with injury to a child. All three remain in custody in the Harris County jail without bail.

The three are accused of robbing Luis Garcia at gunpoint at a car wash in the 8300 block of Jensen late Tuesday night. When Garcia said he had little money, two of the gunmen forced his wife and four children from his Chevrolet Suburban. Garcia's 23-month-old daughter, Stephanie, was killed when she was run over as the robbers made their getaway.

Though the toddler was killed in the commission of a crime, Harris County District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal said, a capital murder charge would have been hard to prove.

"It would be very difficult to make a capital murder case that we could prosecute because it would require proving the specific intent to kill," he said.

Rosenthal said he had his best prosecutors working on the case and that "if they could have done something more serious they would have."

Glaeser said a capital murder charge would have required evidence showing the suspects set out to kill the toddler, but the evidence available did not sustain that charge.

"There are fewer elements to prove in an aggravated robbery and the same evidence would come out regardless of the charge during the trial, and so it is in our opinion a wiser decision to charge these three individuals with aggravated robbery," she said.

Aggravated robbery, like murder, is a first-degree felony. They carry the same punishment.

The three arrested have admitted they were involved in the robbery, said homicide investigator Darrell Robertson.

Robertson said the three also are under investigation for other robberies in the area, including one that was committed after the carjacking.

'Just a crime spree' "It seems to have been just a crime spree," he said. "They're riding around and picking what they believe is the weak and the easy pickings as they would put it."

The last three days have been exhausting for the Garcia family as they've tried to come to terms with the loss, made arrangements to bury their daughter in Mexico and learned of the arrests.

Garcia said he wanted justice for his daughter's death, but the news of the arrests offered little relief because it would not bring her back.

"What can I say? Nothing, only that God help them," Garcia said.

The arrests stemmed from tips made to Crime Stoppers, including one that placed the three and the vehicle in the area. On Thursday, Holland and Renfro were arrested at their homes and Holmes was arrested near his home.

Though Garcia told police he had been robbed by two men, most of the tips referred to three men. Robertson said the third suspect apparently was the getaway driver, but was as involved in the planning and commission of the robberies as the other two.

Police suspect the three were involved in several robberies in northeast Houston. Robertson said all three lived on the northwest side.

"At this time there are several robberies that we are looking at in and around the northeast and north area that we believe that these three are responsible for," Robertson said.

Driver confessed, police say Also, he said all three knew at some point that the toddler had been run over. He said Holland was charged with injury to a child because he confessed to driving the vehicle when the child was struck and killed.

He said Holland and Renfro were longtime friends, having known each other since middle school and that Holmes had recently joined them. None of the three were employed, he said.

"They didn't really do a lot of anything," Robertson said, "except hang around and plan out some crimes."

armando.villafranca@chron.com


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: carjacking; crime; criminalscum; govwatch; hpd; manslaughteridiot; rascism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: WV Mountain Mama

Should have edited my terminology after finding the article, but not sure the difference legally between capital murder, involuntary manslaughter... I do know the kid was charged in the death of his friend, which was the point I was trying to make...


61 posted on 06/17/2006 7:13:30 AM PDT by WV Mountain Mama (Sadly, doing the right thing means leaving one's comfort zone, which people all too often don't do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty
Though the toddler was killed in the commission of a crime, Harris County District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal said, a capital murder charge would have been hard to prove.

"it would require proving the specific intent to kill," he said. Rosenthal said he had his best prosecutors working on the case and that "if they could have done something more serious they would have."

Bull$hit! Unless you are a police officer killed in the commission of a crime, whether intentional or not; in which case you would definitely be facing murder in the commission of a crime

62 posted on 06/17/2006 7:39:33 AM PDT by suijuris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
No wonder Texas is not at the top of the list when it comes to the rate at which the death penalty is applied!

Sadly....the inner cities of Texas resemble those of any other state and are generally run by democrats...along with the ACLU, LA RAZA, NAACP, the Quanell Xs, corrupt officials, and such....

63 posted on 06/17/2006 8:13:51 AM PDT by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: suijuris

I wonder what the prosecutor & community reaction would be if the perps were white and the victims were black? Just wondering......


64 posted on 06/17/2006 8:17:30 AM PDT by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Aggravated robbery isn't going to go over very well here.


65 posted on 06/17/2006 8:47:50 AM PDT by Xenalyte (Can you count, suckas? I say the future is ours . . . if you can count.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

The Satanist Crowley was prophetic when he declared, "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law." America is sinking closer to the Satanist utopia every day.


66 posted on 06/17/2006 8:49:43 AM PDT by Surtur (Free Trade is NOT Fair Trade unless both economies are equivalent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

Maybe they'll vote out the DA at the next opportunity?


67 posted on 06/17/2006 8:59:47 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("The root of the state is in the family. The root of the family is in the person of its head.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty
"Aggravated robbery"

I always thought this was a very poor term at best and stupid at worse.

I can understand "Aggravated assault", using the common meaning of the word "Aggravated" but, how to you Aggravate someone to commit robbery? Man you pi$$ed me off so much I am going to rob you!

I don't expect anything from lawyers to make sense to the average individual as the more confusing they can make something the more you need lawyers.

68 posted on 06/17/2006 9:11:18 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (The difference between democrats and terrorists is the terrorists don't claim to support the troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

sure looks like felony murder to me.


69 posted on 06/17/2006 9:14:26 AM PDT by OldCorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer
Legally,aggravated does NOT mean the victim did something to incite the crime;it means the crime itself is in degree worse than ordinary.Probably aggravated robbery because the gun was displayed unlike robbery in which the threat is implied but no physical assault takes place.

The prosecutor is a chicken***t b*****d for letting vicous killers go uncharged.

At the absolute minimum they are guilty of involuntary manslaughter if they indeed meant no harm.Since they threatened use of deadly force in the carjacking itself they demonstrated violent intent;therefore I say they are guilty of murder in the first degree.The first degree because they planned the crime in which an innocent died.

And I would grant conditional amnesty to the possibly illegal immigrants in order to get the killers .Conditional to the extent of waiving fines and jail time for past immigration violations and requiring full compliance beginning today.

70 posted on 06/17/2006 9:56:03 AM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a creditcard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Kakaze
Calm yourself... If they had run down a protected species such as a gray ground squirrel or someone's puppy it would have been life for sure!

/sarcasm BIG time

71 posted on 06/17/2006 9:59:51 AM PDT by Libertina (Our troops are INNOCENT until proven otherwise. I'll take their word over the enemy's any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
I would think that the law would allow for prosecution of murder because they undertook actions which could lead to murder i.e. carjacking. They knew the risks of the actions they took, they threw the children out of the "safety" of their car and then ran over one. That's got to qualify as murder.
72 posted on 06/17/2006 3:05:46 PM PDT by mockingbyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

This was in California, right? No . . . well, New York? Massachusetts? Surely not . . . TEXAS!


73 posted on 06/17/2006 6:58:01 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty
Harris County prosecutors decided to file aggravated robbery charges in a deadly carjacking because the evidence did not show the attackers intended to kill a little girl, a key element for a murder charge, officials said.

Perhaps Pennsylvania does not have a "felony murder" law?

74 posted on 06/17/2006 6:59:57 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

You can disagree, but thats the state of the fed law - We had a case under that statute here in Federal District Court - the perp got it dismissed because the judge adopted the view of most federal courts, that is, that the purpose of the carjacking had to be murder or serious bodily harm. Our State AG had let the feds take the case because we have a super limited death penalty here and felony murder wasn't eligible under our lousy state law - luckily our AG was waiting in the courtroom to take the perp into custody when the Fed case got dismissed. BTW, the guy had participatedin the execution style murder of 2 teenagers after he and his friends carjacked them. Perps name was Kenneth Day and he's rotting in prison now. And, yes, i am an attorney (please, no flames - i am a conservative - no aclu or aba for me lol)


75 posted on 06/17/2006 10:02:40 PM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

I thought if someone is killed in the commission of a felony, it's automatic murder.


76 posted on 06/17/2006 10:07:28 PM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

From what the article says, Texas doesn't have a felony murder statute. It also says that first degree murder & aggravated robbery carry the same penalty. Quit jumping all over the prosecutor and read the article.


77 posted on 06/17/2006 10:17:43 PM PDT by RebekahT ("Our government is not the solution to the problem, government is the problem." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: philetus

"I thought if someone is killed in the commission of a felony, it's automatic murder."

Only if the state employs the felony murder rule.


78 posted on 06/17/2006 10:18:39 PM PDT by RebekahT ("Our government is not the solution to the problem, government is the problem." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: RebekahT

See post 53 ... that is the Texas Statute for murder and it sure as heck sounds like it has a felony murder provision. Perhaps it doesn't carry that exact title, but it sure follows the intent that if someone is killed during the commission of a felony, it is murder.


79 posted on 06/18/2006 9:10:40 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("So to hell with that twerp at the [WaPo]. I've got no time for him on a day like this." Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: jpp113
I see what you are saying and a search through Thomas shows that Congress is none too happy with how the courts are interpreting Congress' intent. Whether or not this case will prompt Congress to once again clarify their intent remains to be seen, but if this one doesn't, nothing will. Actually, if you want to hoist me on my own petard, question the constitutionality of this law under the Commerce Clause. The DOJ Criminal Resource Manual leaves open the possibility that the law will some day be successfully challenged. Personally, I believe it is an unconstitutional stretch of that clause. But why wouldn't Holloway v United States support my contention that the act of pointing the gun was sufficient?
80 posted on 06/18/2006 9:25:55 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("So to hell with that twerp at the [WaPo]. I've got no time for him on a day like this." Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson