You're blowing bong smoke.
All Coulter said was:
"In 2002, the Seattle Times described the case against accused spy Judith Coplon as "entirely circumstantial."
That is a true sentence.
You said it was a lie.
You are the liar.
Oh, please. You're being really unbelievable. The case was described as "entirely circumstantial" because it was. Ann portrays the book review as a leftist's denial of reality, when the truth is that it was a conservative's description of what really happened.
Sorry, but in my book, that's lying.
Yes, it is. Of course, following this sentence up by describing the article in question as "Liberal refusal to accept any evidence that any person ever spied for the Soviet Union..." is lying, but don't let that bother you.