And yet it is in the same paragraph in which she discusses the evidence against Coplon, immediately after quoting Ramsey. Strange, ins't it?
If you think Coulter has a clue (or a care) who Bruce Ramsey is, you are sadly mistaken.
That must be why she quoted him in her book.
"In 2002, the Seattle Times described the case against accused spy Judith Coplon as "entirely circumstantial."
MY GOD WHAT A LIE. LIAR! PANTS ON FIRE! WHY A LYING WITCH!!!! -- JTN
Except, it's entirely true.
(Note to self--don't argue with druggies. It's like talking to a stoned wall.)