Oy, you're a mendacious wretch! I was on that thread; you came into the thread half-cocked and assumed he was "gang-piling" on an (abusive) poster. You patronizingly asked him not to ping you "this way again." So he took you off.
Tonite you're in here like a jilted lover quibbling with SH with your silly rhetorical suppositions "Does her rhetoric help? I do not think it does . . . it is lowbrow and it is not appreciated by the masses, who by the way, are voters. So do the math again on how turning off voters helps win elections?"
I don't know how to spell it out any clearer than this: NUMBER 1 NY TIMES BEST SELLER. You don't think it's "appreciated by the masses?" And you know this how? I suppose 50,000 people (so far) putting down cash to buy the thing indicates what?
All you are is some initials on a screen and you've figured out how to become a best-selling author. Your hauteur would be breathtaking if you weren't such a pathetic twit.
Your opinion of AC is obviously colored by your immature reaction to Sam Hill. Go ahead and flatter yourself with your banal locutions and leave the SH to his important work.
LOL. Funny post.
Yeah, important comments like, "That's the bong talking."
Your whole post was so hilarious, that I missed this the first time through. I provided the link. I didn't come in half-cocked, I was pinged. I specifically asked him to keep me on the ping list, while asking him not to use it to pile-on fellow FReepers. I also told him how much I enjoy his articles. Why did he ping everyone, to send well wishes to the poster he quoted (as opposed to gang-piling)? Mendacious! Ok, I'm laughing all over again. (Go read the link again, if you even did the first time!)