That book and the review goes exactly the same way - it emphasizes FUD; acknowledgment is brief and made as insignificant as possible, only to provide a sufficient smoke screen and a cover.
You have got to be joking. The words "Coplon was a spy." are put there only to provide cover for what? His belief that Coplon was not a spy? What do you think he was trying to cover?
127 posted on 06/16/2006 7:27:37 PM PDT by JTN
("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")