Posted on 06/16/2006 5:05:55 PM PDT by ChessExpert
“As he turned to assault the next bunker an NVA machine gun opened up and he was mortally wounded. Captain Sosa-Camejo's valorous action and devotion to duty are in keeping with the highest traditions of the military service and reflect great credit upon himself, his unit, and the United States Army."
From his limousine Michael Moore sneers at this Cuban-American and his Band of Brothers as wimps and crybabies "with a yellow stripe down their backs."
Maybe I'm biased, but nothing – absolutely nothing – Ann Coulter has said about Murtha, Kerry or McClellan strikes me as remotely comparable in vileness, cowardice and rank stupidity as Michael Moore's blanket calumny against some of the bravest men of the 20th century.”
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
I'll back Coulter with her hands cuffed behind her back over FatBoy.
It would be nice if we could just send Coulter and Moore off to some island where they can be alone with each other. Then they can lie and smear each other all they want and leave the rest of us alone.
Good find. God, if it weren't for the internet I'd probably still be a liberal. When they controlled the news and the universities, I never, ever heard the other side of the story, not on anything, not once.
I'd take Ann over Moore anytime myself. Unless of course, they're talking about a hot dog eating contest....LOL
"I'll back Coulter with her hands cuffed behind her back over FatBoy."
Those cuffs would fall off like cheap jewelry.
Ann would have nothing to say if she were limited to telling lies about Moore. The man is truly smarmy!
>>Then they can lie and smear each other all they want and leave the rest of us alone.<<
And the lie Coulter told was???
-no replies-
You poor thing!
It would take a book to cover them all, but here's my personal favorite:
Giving slapdash, conservative polemic a bad nameAnn Coulter is the conservative babe whose modus vivendi, says Andrew Sullivan, is to "look amazing and ratchet up the rhetoric against the Left until it has the subtlety and nuance of a car alarm." Her latest book, "Treason" (2003), is one long accusation of disloyalty, and includes one paragraph about me.
As part of a chapter on media types being apologists for Reds, she attacks a newspaper book review I wrote on "The Spy Who Seduced America." The spy was Judith Coplon, convicted in 1950 after a public trial in which she was defended in the press by the liberals of the day. The two words Coulter quoted from my review said that the government's case against Coplon was "entirely circumstantial." Coulter replied:
"The circumstance was this: in March 1949, she was arrested while handing secret government documents to a Russian agent. I suppose you could call that a "circumstance." Needless to say, Soviet cables confirmed that Coplon was a Soviet agent. Liberal refusal to accept any evidence that any person ever spied for the Soviet Union would be exasperating if it weren't so comical."I read this paragraph over a few times, hardly believing it. The book in question, written by FBI agent Thomas Mitchell and wife Marcia, had concluded that Coplon was guilty. I had agreed: Coplon was a communist spy. Indeed, the title of my review, which is accurately listed in Coulter's footnote, includes the words, "a True Tale of Espionage."
Further, I had said in the review that the labeling of the postwar spy cases as "witch hunts" and "McCarthyism" is a falsification, because there were communist employees in the government spying for the Soviet Union.
As for the "entirely circumstantial" evidence, Coplon, a federal employee, was arrested while meeting with a Russian agent. Coplon had not taken the classified documents from her purse, and was not handing them to him. In another five minutes she probably would have, and of course the meeting itself was damning (but circumstantial) evidence. Yes, Soviet cables confirmed that Coplon was a Soviet agent — but for security reasons, the government had not used those cables as evidence.
So here I was, a non-liberal favorably reviewing a book that exposes a communist spy, and I am accused of "refusal to accept any evidence that any person ever spied for the Soviet Union."
Well, I stopped reading her book. I couldn't believe a thing in it. — Bruce Ramsey
I apologize for taking nearly 9 minutes to reply. I trust you will find #13 to your satisfaction.
No replies? Come on, what's taking so long?
#13
Please document the "lies" and "smears" Ann has told.
Bonus points - Do it without taking her remarks out of context like liberals usually do.
I don't understand where she says you were necessarily wrong....?
Your citation contains no Coulter lies.
Try again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.