To: VadeRetro
From his blog, all I can see so far is that at least two replies have pointed out the problem and Dembski has not responded. Is there more somewhere? I recall hearing about a similar episode. In that case, the embarrassing material just vanished, and was never mentioned again. It never happened. Save this one if it matters to you, because if things run true to course, this too will cease to exist.
37 posted on
06/16/2006 5:15:05 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: PatrickHenry
... this too will cease to exist.Of course, this thread will exist. But in the case of the lead article, it was ... well [cough, cough] an independent discovery.
39 posted on
06/16/2006 5:17:50 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: PatrickHenry
Note that I said "at least two replies" when the number is three. That's because some of us have the secret understanding that the number after two is two.
40 posted on
06/16/2006 5:21:59 PM PDT by
VadeRetro
(Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson