[balrog666]

Amusingly enough. Dembski could have absolutely quelled all problems and commentary by just noting that his first posting was in error, relatively speaking; made the correction, and continued. Of course, like all creationists, he is unable to ever admit to a mistake (even in arithmetic) and thus continues to burrow into mathematical inanity.

Make that complete inanity - he's a parody of himself.

[VadeRetro]

Make that complete inanity - he's a parody of himself.

Dembski has of late become the most conspicuously creationist of ID-ers, surpassing Johnson, Wells, and Meyers. Consider the tripe he wrote or let pass in the relevant chapters of Ann Coulter's Godless. Add in his refusal to correct or acknowledge "double normalization" of the Google data in the instance this thread is about. Brazenly polemic, sneeringly dishonest.

And those would seem to be his good points.