Was it or was it not Bush who said shortly after 9-11 "either you're with us or you're against us"?
Was that the same method the left uses that you were talking about?
As someone else pointed out, Bush has plenty of time to meet with illegals at the diego garcia center but not those American citizens on the front line of our border war to the south.
"As someone else pointed out, Bush has plenty of time to meet with illegals at the diego garcia center but not those American citizens on the front line of our border war to the south."
Thank you. Why did W elect not to meet with the NAACP? Simple; they only wanted him there so they could launch into a fusillade of attacks on him which would be picked up by a liberal media.
Why doesn't he meet with this group? Because they only want him there to launch a series of attacks, which will be dutifully picked up and amplified by the liberal media.
That the NAACP is a bunch of socialists and these guys have a valid point is a separate matter! The *effect* of meeting with each would be to damage W AND the conservative cause in general. The libs do not care why conservatives can be targeted; they only care *that* conservatives can be targeted. Their goal isn't to elect "real" or "paleo" or "[insert your favorite phrase here]" conservatives; their goal is to elect Democrats.
That's why this tactic of demanding a meeting and petulantly griping when the demand isn't met is trashy; because it doesn't serve anyone's ends except the libs.
When conservatives believe they must argue against our President, we should fight like brothers, not like enemies.