Replies

Some posters believe, just because a FReeper does not support the President on current S2611 immigration Shamnesty that were bashing Bush.

Shamnesty is wrong and I would be against it no matter who suggested it as an alternative to a bad no enforcement border policy.

I agree with
Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Allen (R-VA)
Bond (R-MO)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burns (R-MT)
Burr (R-NC)
Byrd (D-WV)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Dole (R-NC)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Lott (R-MS)
Nelson (D-NE)
Roberts (R-KS)
Santorum (R-PA)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Sununu (R-NH)
Talent (R-MO)
Thomas (R-WY)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Federation for American Immigration Reform
Heritage Foundation
Numbers USA
that this legislation is a travesty for current citizens and future generations of this country.

Would you consider the above to be Bush Bashers just because they have a different opinion on Shamnesty than does the president?

Some of the weak faint of heart sisters on this forum need to understand that conservatives unlike liberals do not always march lock step with those in Washington.

Especially when the legislation they support is diametrically opposed to what the overwhelming majority of Americans want.

Because I do not support the President on S2611 Shamnesty does this mean I cannot also support him on the other 90% of legislation where we do agree?

I listened to the entire debate in the Senate and it made me sick how the Democrats along with the RINO’s sounded almost giddy as they crammed this travesty down the throat of America.