Skip to comments.
House Rejects Timetable for Iraq Pullout (256-153)
AP ^
Posted on 06/16/2006 8:28:07 AM PDT by slowhand520
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: slowhand520
I can envision the election commercials already.
To: slowhand520
I'm sure the usual house commies/socialists voted to leave Iraq.
To: slowhand520
I can't wait for the actual voting breakdown. Hooray for those 42 brave Democrats who voted FOR this non-binding resolution. This is a genuine point of substantial support for our troops in the field in this War on Global Islamo-Terrorists. Hooray for the voting populace of Iraq and for their newly formed government.
4
posted on
06/16/2006 8:36:24 AM PDT
by
YepYep
To: slowhand520
5
posted on
06/16/2006 8:37:14 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: slowhand520
This is great! In the GWOT, this is a great ideological victory for the US!
6
posted on
06/16/2006 8:37:45 AM PDT
by
The Blitherer
("These are not dark days, these are great days." – W. S. Churchill)
To: slowhand520
In a 256-153 vote, the GOP-led House approved a nonbinding resolution that praises U.S. troops, labels the Iraq war part of the larger global fight against terrorism and says an "arbitrary date for the withdrawal or redeployment" of troops is not in the national interest. I suppose it's necessary to smack the Dems with a 2-by-4 made of the obvious facts periodically.
7
posted on
06/16/2006 8:38:48 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
To: slowhand520
so, 256-153 in the house, 92-6 in the Senate. IOW, we have 159 names that have firmly placed themselves in the Traitor category.
8
posted on
06/16/2006 8:39:09 AM PDT
by
commish
(Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to protect it.)
To: The Blitherer
CNN reported earlier today about the Senate action by saying "the issue was tabled for now..." rather than reporting the overwhelming vote. Pigs.
The text of this resolution should be endlessly repeated to let the voters know where their "leaders" really stand.
Anyone have the full text of the resolution?
To: The Blitherer
So, who was voting again? 256 Americans and 153 Al-qaida?
10
posted on
06/16/2006 8:39:43 AM PDT
by
C210N
(Bush SPYED, Terrorists DIED!)
To: slowhand520
Nancy PeeLOUSY is "a grotesque mistake"...
The DEMS are uniquely positioned to achieve recto-cranial insertion with 100% effectiveness.
G
11
posted on
06/16/2006 8:39:48 AM PDT
by
GRRRRR
(WHERE is the next Ronald Reagan? Virginia?)
To: slowhand520
How can the Dems ever be taken seriously when discussing our country's defense? Talk about an implosion
To: slowhand520
Does anyone have the names of those voting to pull out before we win?
13
posted on
06/16/2006 8:41:54 AM PDT
by
rightinthemiddle
(Islamic Terrorists, the Mainstream Media and the Democrat Party Have the Same Goals in Iraq.)
To: slowhand520
The Democrats lose their big chance for more Killing Fields in Iraq.
If they ever win back the House, they'll cut off the money in a heartbeat.
14
posted on
06/16/2006 8:42:59 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: YepYep
FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 288BILL TITLE: Declaring that the United States will prevail in the Global War on Terror, the struggle to protect freedom from the terrorist adversary
15
posted on
06/16/2006 8:44:10 AM PDT
by
michigander
(The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
To: slowhand520
................Yeas Nays PRES NV
Republican 214.....3.......2.......12
Democratic 42......149.....3.......7
Independent 1
TOTALS 256 153 5 19
Detailed roll call
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll288.xml
3 Repub nays that you want to know about
Duncan, Paul, Leach
16
posted on
06/16/2006 8:45:03 AM PDT
by
Da Mav
To: Carry_Okie
How did Pelosi and Murtha vote? That's the key to these articles.
17
posted on
06/16/2006 8:45:19 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Democrats - The reason we need term limits)
To: slowhand520
18
posted on
06/16/2006 8:45:19 AM PDT
by
Republican Red
(Everyone is super stoked on Gore. Even if they don't know it)
To: slowhand520
Could the article make any more efforts to "explain" the result from the dem viewpoint? It's gotten pretty sickening. Things happen that plainly are Bush administration victories, and the media is full of nonsense about how it isn't really a victory. I think they may have jumped the shark reporting on Zarqawi's death.
19
posted on
06/16/2006 8:46:09 AM PDT
by
Williams
To: ChicagoConservative27
I'm sure some of the 153 are commies & socialists... however they ALL are backstabbing bastards to their countries fighting men & women.
“Cowards and pissants!” -Cordell Hull, Dec. 7, 1941
20
posted on
06/16/2006 8:47:21 AM PDT
by
johnny7
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson