Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China to Cut Tariff on Cars, Auto Parts from July1 [from 28% to 25%, Fair Trade?]
AmericanEconomicAlert.org ^ | 6/15/06 | China Economic Net , Ed.

Posted on 06/16/2006 3:57:47 AM PDT by ProCivitas

China to cut tariff on cars, auto parts from July 1 Last Updated(Beijing Time):2006-06-15 17:29

China will further cut import taxes on some cars and auto parts as of July 1, the Ministry of Finance announced Thursday. With the approval of the Chinese government, the Customs Tariff Commission of the State Council, has decided to lower the tariffs on cars, SUVs (sports utility vehicles or cross-country vehicles),and mini-buses from 28 percent to 25 percent, said the ministry.

Meanwhile, the import taxes on auto parts, such as auto bodies, under-pans, medium and low emission gasoline engines, will be reduced to 10 percent from a range between 13.8 percent and 16.4 percent.

The move was made to comply with the country's commitments on tariff reduction upon its entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001.

The latest tariff cuts came only six months after China slashed import tariffs on more than 100 categories of products beginning Jan. 1, 2006, involving vegetable oil, raw chemical materials, automobiles and parts.

The import tariff rate for sedans, mini-buses and cross-country vehicles was lowered from 30 percent to 28 percent since Jan. 1, while that for auto parts such as gear boxes, absorbers, radiators, clutches and steering gears was cut from 13.5 percent to 10 percent.

Up to now, China has fully complied with its automobile-related tariff cut commitments upon its WTO accession, said the ministry in a statement.

The European Union (EU) and the United States have filed request to China for talks on auto parts tariffs under the WTO trade dispute settlement mechanism.

The EU complained that some of China's rules on car import tariffs are not in accordance with WTO rules, putting their car manufacturers at a disadvantage compared to local producers.

China announced in early April it has accepted a request from both the European Union and the United States for talks with China on auto parts tariffs under the WTO trade dispute settlement mechanism.

In responses to the request, Cong Quan, spokesman for the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, expressed regret on the EU's plan to file a WTO complaint against China's rules over imports of auto parts.

China said its taxes are aimed at curbing tax evasion by some foreign auto manufactures, saying that some of them disassemble their cars before importing and then reassemble them in the country thereby avoiding customs payments on importing whole cars.

Source:Xinhuanet Related articles


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fairtrade; predatorytrade; tariffs; trade; tradepolicy
Given that the communist regime there doesn't allow independent labor unions, and constitutes an organized horror regarding human rights violations, it's startling they're allowed to have a 25% tariff against auto imports from civilized countries that do undertake the cost of 'civic standards' like freedom of association and ecological standards. I think the China Economic Net (ce.cn?) is a Chinese News Service, so probably influenced by the regime there.
1 posted on 06/16/2006 3:57:52 AM PDT by ProCivitas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ProCivitas

I knew when the ChiComs shanghied Jack Bauer they had something like this in mind. Walmart's obviously involved too.


2 posted on 06/16/2006 4:08:54 AM PDT by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProCivitas
George Soros is investing $200 in a venture to ship Chicom autos to the USA, I hope we have a like tariff on their autos.
3 posted on 06/16/2006 8:37:36 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Make them go home!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Mike, I might not be a wiz at 'high finance', but I just don't see how a "$200" investment is going to be worth Soros's time and attention. 'Course maybe one's dollar goes farther over there. :D


4 posted on 06/16/2006 12:38:14 PM PDT by ProCivitas (Qui bono? Quo warranto? ; Who benefits? By what right/authority ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ProCivitas
Hmmm, make that $200 million.
5 posted on 06/16/2006 12:48:02 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Make them go home!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson