Replies

"No I don't feel that way at all."

Yeah, right.

"The gay issue, on the other hand, is a stand alone matter especially as it relates to the war on terrorism and my favorite issue of border security. "

I mentioned it as an example, not as an issue.
You need to learn what an example is.

"How is anybody going to take you seriously if your agenda is consistently being hijacked by the gay priority?"

Once again, the terrorism was an example, not the issue.
Once again, you have failed to meet the standards.
"Gay Tourism" will turn into "Sex Tourism" quicker than you can say "The Wiggles" or "Booh-Bah".
Then there's the gay marriage issue where they will 'wed abroad' and insist their 'union' be recognized in the US.

Now, take two bolts, and show me how by themselves they can be united.
Using ONLY the bolts themselves.

"Gay Tourism" will turn into "Sex Tourism" quicker than you can say "The Wiggles" or "Booh-Bah".
Then there's the gay marriage issue where they will 'wed abroad' and insist their 'union' be recognized in the US."

I really don't have strong views on the gay agenda. Personally I think gay marriage is a mistake, yet I have no difficulty supporting gay unions. What people do in private is their business. And as long as it is not degrading or exploitive of another person I am not going to get overly agitated one way or the other.
My concern is very simple, I think the gay Canada dialog sucks the energy out of everything else. How can you be a serious player in respect of the border security issues when all that is reported is Canada's plan to recruit gay tourists. Surely it is an image problem for Canada. For example, if you were to get Rasmussen to poll people on three things they knew about Canada you can be certain that the gay agenda would be near the top, right after government administered health care. I think that is a problem, but apparently no one else thinks it a problem.