Keep on posting brytlea, you make my point(the hypocrisy of the tancredo zealots) with each of your posts.
Loophole-- A technicality that allows a person or business to avoid the scope of a law without directly violating the law.
The poster I was responding to said:
This man obviously broke the law and used a loophole to do it. He SHOULD be fined at the LEAST.
I simply pointed out that if he used a loophole, he didn't break the law. For that observation, I got back:
Ahhh, immoral but not illegal?
Which prompted me to clarify:
I was not commenting on the morality of what he did. I was commenting on what you said:
This man obviously broke the law and used a loophole to do it. He SHOULD be fined at the LEAST.
I believe that if it is a loophole, he did not break the law, so, legally what can be done to him?
This in turn prompted you to suggest that I am somehow applauded by the likes of Bill Clinton et al. Now, I gotta think you mean that as some sort of a put down, since I've never seen you say anything nice to anyone except open border advocates. The other thing I might also discern is that you either cannot read well, or you like taking what people say and twisting into something it isn't, to make your point. Of course, if you really had a good point to make, it would stand on its merit and not require you to do what you do.
So, if you think I've commented anywhere in my posts on the rightness or wrongness of what the guy did, find it and post it. Otherwise, I think you owe me an apology. I won't be waiting for one, however, since I've also never seen you do that.
susie