Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: samtheman
That is inconsequential.

What's next: IQ test in order to decide who should be allowed to live? If you test high enough then you are allowed to become a member of society? How smart/how much active brain matter is needed before we won't kill (or if you like PC..before we won't allow one to die via starvation/dehydration)?

Ever heard of Peter Singer? He is the chair of the ethics department at Princeton...he spouts a lot of very dangerous dung including the right of a parent to kill their baby up to one year b/c after all, said baby isn't fully intellectually developed up to that point.
59 posted on 06/16/2006 5:32:22 AM PDT by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: socialismisinsidious

Her parents should have been allowed to take over her care. They were willing and able. To deny them that was wrong.

However, the girl was dead. In the most meaningful medical, clinical and spiritual sense. The girl was dead. No brain function. The rest is fingernails growing on a corpse.


60 posted on 06/16/2006 5:40:33 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson