To: samtheman
That is inconsequential.
What's next: IQ test in order to decide who should be allowed to live? If you test high enough then you are allowed to become a member of society? How smart/how much active brain matter is needed before we won't kill (or if you like PC..before we won't allow one to die via starvation/dehydration)?
Ever heard of Peter Singer? He is the chair of the ethics department at Princeton...he spouts a lot of very dangerous dung including the right of a parent to kill their baby up to one year b/c after all, said baby isn't fully intellectually developed up to that point.
59 posted on
06/16/2006 5:32:22 AM PDT by
socialismisinsidious
( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
To: socialismisinsidious
Her parents should have been allowed to take over her care. They were willing and able. To deny them that was wrong.
However, the girl was dead. In the most meaningful medical, clinical and spiritual sense. The girl was dead. No brain function. The rest is fingernails growing on a corpse.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson