Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback
The question is:

When do you start being a living "human being"....

And

When do you stop being a living "human being"...

Is a physical reality not subject to whim or and arbitrary technicality for lawyer to lose or win?

Because human being's have rights that are not granted by government or laws of men

But if government or laws of men can control and or slide the definition of "living human being"...

Then was we have no right other then what is grated by government or laws of men

Government law parsing definition of who is and is not a living "human being" is a scary way to live

37 posted on 06/15/2006 9:00:48 PM PDT by tophat9000 (If it was illegal French Canadians would La Raza back them? Racist back their race over country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tophat9000
Government law parsing definition of who is and is not a living "human being" is a scary way to live

Man, you got that right.

Try this one when you need some grim meditation: (

1) In Roe vs Wade, yhe USSC professed invincible ignorance as to "what is a human life"; and

2) In "Diamond vs. Chakrabarty," the USSC held that living, manmade genetically engineered organisms are ownable and patentable.

Roe + Diamond = you can genetically engineer human beings, patent them, and own them.

69 posted on 06/16/2006 7:30:57 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("If the Law supposes that," said Mr. Bumble, "the Law is an Ass,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson