Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oblomov

If a drug is produced in, say, Ohio, and sold there, from where does the federal government derive its jurisdiction to regulate this production and sale?

If you're regarding the commerce clause, the original intent of the CC was to prohibit the states from setting up barriers to entry. For example, charging a tariff to a saddle maker to transport his saddles into or through a state. The original intent had noting to do with regulating what products could be transported into or through a state. Nor did the original intent of the CC grant the government permission to regulate a product because it crossed state lines. A huge number of laws created in the last seventy years have been passed under a misinterpretation of the commerce clause. The misinterpretation of the CC has been as intentional as misinterpretation that the constitution is a living document is intentional. 

160 posted on 06/15/2006 1:57:50 PM PDT by Zon (Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: Zon

agreed


179 posted on 06/15/2006 3:25:16 PM PDT by oblomov (Join the FR Folding@Home Team (#36120) keyword: folding@home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson