To: jess35
If it could be proven that the occupants of the house shot a police officer who did not announce himself before breaking down the door, I'd have a hard time voting for a conviction. Of course you would. But, then, that's you, siding with a meth dealer.
119 posted on
06/15/2006 12:10:44 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(Today, we settled all family business.)
To: sinkspur
It's not about siding with a meth dealer. It's all about standing up to the police powers of the state when they abuse the trust we put in them. If anyone busts down my door and I have a firearm nearby, I'm going to shoot.
126 posted on
06/15/2006 12:24:44 PM PDT by
jess35
To: sinkspur
Drug dealers have just as much right as you to protect their property from unknown intruders.
197 posted on
06/15/2006 3:47:13 PM PDT by
KurtZ
(Chuck Norris + Ninja Clothing + Time Machine = Black Plague)
To: sinkspur
Of course you would. But, then, that's you, siding with a meth dealer. Actually, siding with the innocent victims of such raids. When cops infringe innocent people's rights, there's usually no punishment. Ironically, the only effective punishments against cops who infringe people's rights are generally only applicable when their victims happen to be criminals.
202 posted on
06/15/2006 3:57:46 PM PDT by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
To: sinkspur
But, then, that's you, siding with a meth dealer.No, that's him siding with the 4th Amendment.
To: sinkspur
Of course you would. But, then, that's you, siding with a meth dealer.You wouldn't shoot someone who came barging into your home?
274 posted on
06/16/2006 11:58:43 AM PDT by
jmc813
(The best mathematical equation I have ever seen: 1 cross + 3 nails= 4 given.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson