Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MACVSOG68
I could not agree more with you. I suggest you take that to heart. If a position (or crusade)can only be effectively promoted through lies, distortions and dissembling, I suggest there could be something wrong with the crusade.

SO -cease your homosexuality is okay cheerleading efforts on FR already! NOTHING can legitimize homosexuality just as nothing can legitimize the beating the child received... -no buts...

The only coherent theme evident in your multiple postings on homosexual agenda topics is one of support for the homosexualization of society --SUPPORT at the expense of whatever rational a FReeper may have posted the topic for discussion upon. Rational related to OPPOSING the homosexualization of society NOT supporting it!

You do understand this???

Much as you would like to divert the discussion to the father -the discussion involves primarily the fact that a child was beaten as a result of homosexual activism...

IF you wish to discuss the father and whatever wacko theories you wish to posit THEN no one is stopping you from posting said articles and even creating a ping list to debate how the father is mean and evil...

189 posted on 06/14/2006 7:18:34 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: DBeers
SO -cease your homosexuality is okay cheerleading efforts on FR already! NOTHING can legitimize homosexuality just as nothing can legitimize the beating the child received... -no buts...

The lie never ceases with you. I don't have to legitimize homosexuality. That's not even the issue here, though you would like to make it so. And I agree with you completely, nothing can legitimize the beating the child allegedly received. As I said, the perpetrators must be punished.

The only coherent theme evident in your multiple postings on homosexual agenda topics is one of support for the homosexualization of society --SUPPORT at the expense of whatever rational a FReeper may have posted the topic for discussion upon. Rational related to OPPOSING the homosexualization of society NOT supporting it!

You keep that silly theme. But our discussions have not been about the homosexualization of society, but issues such as human rights, consitutional issues, and in this case true motives.

Much as you would like to divert the discussion to the father -the discussion involves primarily the fact that a child was beaten as a result of homosexual activism...

The article made the father the issue, not me. I only know that this does certainly not hurt Parker's plan. I despise anyone who would use a child as a pawn, just as I despise anyone who would harm a child. But both can be culpable.

IF you wish to discuss the father and whatever wacko theories you wish to posit THEN no one is stopping you from posting said articles and even creating a ping list to debate how the father is mean and evil...

Any parent not used to homosexual materials in school would likely react negatively. For that, even though Parker knew what was there, I can accept his initial reaction, because I would likely have reacted similarly. From that point on, I don't. I know he is the hero of many here, but anyone who puts their kids into the cauldron he did deserves no respect, let alone hero status.

206 posted on 06/14/2006 8:08:20 PM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson