To: Blueflag
OK are we dealing with a politically correct euphemism here? Does "big" mean he was FAT? Or does "big" mean he was 6'8" 265 lbs?I too noticed the lack of detail there and went searching. I found two URLs with pictures, for what they're worth:
Undated photo with smh.com.au story
2003 photo
To: Lonely Bull
He looks tall but not heavy.
How would you like to go from being a human being to being a landmark known only as 'Green Boots'?
To: Lonely Bull
He looks like I could have thrown him over my shoulder and hardly noticed he was there.
73 posted on
06/14/2006 4:54:32 PM PDT by
Straight Vermonter
(The Stations of the Cross in Poetry ---> http://www.wayoftears.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson