Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blueflag
OK are we dealing with a politically correct euphemism here? Does "big" mean he was FAT? Or does "big" mean he was 6'8" 265 lbs?

I too noticed the lack of detail there and went searching. I found two URLs with pictures, for what they're worth:

Undated photo with smh.com.au story

2003 photo

13 posted on 06/14/2006 6:22:21 AM PDT by Lonely Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Lonely Bull
He looks tall but not heavy.

How would you like to go from being a human being to being a landmark known only as 'Green Boots'?

57 posted on 06/14/2006 3:04:36 PM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Lonely Bull

He looks like I could have thrown him over my shoulder and hardly noticed he was there.


73 posted on 06/14/2006 4:54:32 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (The Stations of the Cross in Poetry ---> http://www.wayoftears.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson