To: Jameison
Frankly..I don't give a rats behind what some 9/11 widows think. I'm worried about the kind of comments a so-called Conservative woman is making.
You don't attack widows, I don't care what kind of crazy stuff they do..it's not smart. There are too many other good targets like Hillary. As for the widows attacking Bush....were you aware that Ann called for Bush to be impeached when she disagreed with him?
I looked up to Ann and hoped she could be a voice for the female Conservative movement. Now it seems she is just in it for the shock value and the money just like Sheehan.
To: Earthdweller
"Frankly..I don't give a rats behind what some 9/11 widows think"
I do.
When you go about calling The President a murderer, I can call you anything I like, including a haprpie, and including the accusation that you are enjoying your husband's death.
"I'm worried about the kind of comments a so-called Conservative woman is making."
I am not.
I love them comments, and from the letters column in the New York Post, plenty of New Yorkers are solid;ly backing Ann too, even in very liberal New York.
"You don't attack widows, I don't care what kind of crazy stuff they do"
So according to you, all them female suicide bomber widows, that have been carrying out suicide bombings in the Middle East,p and taking along with them innocent women and children, are totally above being criticized, let alone condemned for carrying out mass murder.
Nice.
You know what?
Why don't you quit while you still have some dignity left?
A few more posts and you'll be mincemeat.
24 posted on
06/14/2006 12:22:19 PM PDT by
Jameison
To: Earthdweller
"As for the widows attacking Bush....were you aware that Ann called for Bush to be impeached when she disagreed with him? "
That is the same as calling the President a murderer?
25 posted on
06/14/2006 12:25:05 PM PDT by
Jameison
To: Earthdweller
You don't attack widows, I don't care what kind of crazy stuff they do..it's not smart. Then you are missing the point and ceding the victory to the Dems. The whole point Coulter is making is that the Left seeks out these "victims" and uses them to promote their agenda talking points, knowing their "victim" status will protect them from any and all criticism.
I don't care if you are a cripple like Cleland, a minority like Jackson, a "bereaved" mother like Sheehan or a widow like the Jersey media sluts; when you cross the line into partisan politics, your victimhood cuts no more ice. You forfeit any and all moral high ground and are judged by your words and actions.
35 posted on
06/14/2006 12:55:22 PM PDT by
LexBaird
("Politically Correct" is the politically correct term for "F*cking Retarded". - Psycho Bunny)
To: Earthdweller
You make Ann's point with great clarity.
54 posted on
06/14/2006 1:34:38 PM PDT by
ShandaLear
(Gringos Unite!!!)
To: Earthdweller; Jameison
You don't attack widows, I don't care what kind of crazy stuff they do
That attitude is EXACTLY what Coulter is working against.
Widowhood does not confer authority on the manner in which one became a widow.
Further, a widow shouldn't get a pass if she's acting like a freak. Widowhood doesn't immunize one from criticism (or shouldn't, in a sane society).
Finally, I don't think even you, Earthdweller, would argue that Coulter has no right to say what she thinks. That would be intolerant and would reek of censorship.
63 posted on
06/14/2006 1:52:02 PM PDT by
Xenalyte
(The trouble with ignorance is that it picks up confidence as it goes along.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson