[stands2reason]

The people who think Ann's comments are fine have no standing to criticize the likes of Moore, Maher, and Carville on their invective.

[beyond the sea]

Very true.

[Peach]

Exactly!

[beyond the sea]

The people who think Ann's comments are fine have no standing to criticize the likes of Moore, Maher, and Carville on their invective.

I like the way you think.

;-)

[tarheelswamprat]

The people who think Ann's comments are fine have no standing to criticize the likes of Moore, Maher, and Carville on their invective.

That's silly nonsense. You are proceeding from the false premise that the most important factor we must use in evaluating the "Coulter issue" is "style"; it is not. The most important factor is "truth".

Although we might not like the "invective" of Moore, Maher and Carville, we don't battle them because they offend us or hurt our feelings. We battle them because they LIE about important matters which will eventually destroy our country if their lies are allowed to prevail.

They lie; Coulter tells the truth. That is the essential criterion. Style may be important to some of us, but it won't matter one whit to history.