She could have avoided the damage and still made the point about the "protected victims".
She needs a better editor. (jmo)
"She could have avoided the damage and still made the point about the "protected victims"."
A lot of people have made that point. Many have said that she should have used "exploited," for instance.
Coulter has been fight for the conservative cause for her entire adult life. (With little or no remuneration until only very recently.)
In October 1998 Coulter got up on the stage of FR's first rally and expressed her support. Against the advice of her agent and publishers.
She has endured every kind of insult and calumny. And she has been physically threatened.
It is disgusting beyond belief to see so many so-called conservatives on a forum she helped to put on the map go apoplectic over her use of one word ("enjoy") instead of another (such as "exploit").
Especially when "enjoy" certainly can be argued to be true. (Who could argue that Cindy Sheehan is not enjoying her tragedy?)
And certainly the reaction to her words has proved the truth of her actual argument a hundred times over. That these people have been sanctified by their victimhood, and that they hide behind it--with the media's complicity.
Sinkspur has led a pack of ravening dogs in attacking everything they can dream up to attack about her. He (and others) have made up total lies out of whole cloth. And it was largely (and in the case of SS, wholly) bogus outrage.
It was just done for some kind of sordid kicks.
It's really no wonder we conservatives have so few good people on our side. I'm amazed we have any.