To: Mike Bates
How does Coulter know it to be true that, "I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much." There is no evidence whatsoever that those women enjoyed their husbands' deaths, and Coulter offers none.
What an absolutely assinine premise. The assertion that "I've never seen..." necessarily implies a subjective point of view. In other words, to her eyes these four women appear to be enjoying the benefits of their husbands' deaths. There is nothing to prove. It is solely Ann's interpretation. The author is too stupid to comprehend that. Now, if Ann had said, "These women are enjoying their husbands' deaths," then one could reasonably demand proof. Ann, however, deliberately couches her statements in the language of subjective opinion.
This author is making a bumbling effort to discredit Ann logically and, like most Lefties, fails miserably because hee doesn't even understand the concept of logic.
46 posted on
06/13/2006 3:18:35 PM PDT by
fr_freak
To: fr_freak
Exactly. As if there's some sort of "Enjoyment meter" once can hook into a person to derive an objective measurement of enjoyment levels. Coulter never claimed to have any such device, so her remark was merely an opinion of what she's observed. It wasn't stated as metaphysical certainty.
56 posted on
06/13/2006 3:21:32 PM PDT by
MikeA
(Not voting in November because you're pouting is a vote for Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson