[EDINVA]

"If these women were appearing to support the war effort, we'd be lavishing them with praise..."

no, we really wouldn't because if they WERE supporting the war effort and/or President Bush we would never have heard of them.

[Steve_Seattle]

" . . . no, we really wouldn't because if they WERE supporting the war effort and/or President Bush we would never have heard of them."

How true. A recent case in point: Who did CNN give a platform to the day after Zarqawi was killed? Bush/Iraq War critic Michael Berg. For 24 hours, CNN became The Michael Berg Channel, e.g., Bush is a bigger terrorist than Zarqawi, etc. Of course, no one in the media said that BERG was over the top.

[Darkwolf377]

no, we really wouldn't because if they WERE supporting the war effort and/or President Bush we would never have heard of them.

Touche--except WE would because we'd be posting about them here and wondering why the MSM never has them on. (Easy answer: Because Chrissy Matthews and company wouldn't be comfortable being tough with them.)