Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New glacier theory on Stonehenge
BBC News ^ | June 13, 2006

Posted on 06/13/2006 7:27:54 AM PDT by billorites

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: ozzymandus

Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair.


61 posted on 12/17/2015 9:22:17 AM PST by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Makes more sense than what Hawass is babbling!


62 posted on 12/17/2015 9:33:39 AM PST by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Natufian

All one has to do to appreciate the amount of rocks that can and will be deposited by glaciers is drive the back roads of Southern New England during Winter and observe the stone walls built by farmers who had removed them from their fields.

And thats in an area that was agrarian for maybe 250-300 years, not thousands.

Glacial movement may or may not be what happened to bring the boulders to Stonehenge, but it can’t be ruled out as a reasonable possibility.


63 posted on 12/17/2015 9:51:24 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Indeed and it makes for a beautiful part of the world, New England.


64 posted on 12/17/2015 11:38:46 AM PST by Natufian (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

If the stones were brought by glaciers, then it must have been the glaciers that were manipulated by the Ancient Aliens, right?


65 posted on 12/17/2015 1:38:26 PM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Natufian

Thanks for that link, the pic, the info. The Avebury stones came from there:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockeridge#Landmarks

The glacier advocates claim that the absence of evidence — tools, rollers, ‘gouges’ — means the stones weren’t moved by humans. Since the large menhirs clearly were shaped, there must have been tools around to shape them, but by the same argument — absence of tools — the menhirs must have arrived by glaciers as well, and preshaped. The fact that the tools are not still laying around doesn’t mean that there were never any tools.

During his discussion of the bluestones from Wales, the advocate also states that the 45 ton stones left no marks on the way there — but that’s a straw man argument, as the bluestones only weigh around 4 tons each. And of course, if the bluestones were just random chunks of rock ripped out and moved by a glacier, why the similar size and shape? If there were a pile of them somewhere nearby, which there isn’t, one would expect a variety of shapes and sizes that were rejected, and possibly tailings from shaping those which were moved to the site on the plain and erected. They must have been shaped by tools, but noooooo! The tools are not around any longer.

:’)


66 posted on 12/17/2015 2:08:57 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Grimmy

Those dirty extraterrestrial ice-driving b*st*rds!


67 posted on 12/17/2015 2:24:29 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Dig it.


68 posted on 12/17/2015 2:57:37 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

It ain’t all that bad.

After all, we got a nice stack of rocks out of the deal.


69 posted on 12/17/2015 3:20:17 PM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Interesting. I love this stuff, it’s all so fascinating. Thanks for this (and all your other posts/work), much appreciated.


70 posted on 12/17/2015 3:38:41 PM PST by Natufian (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: billorites; SunkenCiv

The article doesn’t say, but I wonder if any work has been done to try to chart the direction of British glaciers? The Preseli Hills are West North West of Salisbury. The glacier would have to have been basically traveling East to move the stones to Salisbury. But I have always been under the impression the glaciers were a North-South thing.


71 posted on 12/18/2015 3:44:21 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Natufian

Thanks Natufian! The stone age ancestors really roc-, uh, never mind. ;’)


72 posted on 12/18/2015 4:25:38 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Yes, that's a great big hole in the hypothesis, apparently.

73 posted on 12/19/2015 4:29:42 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: billorites


74 posted on 12/19/2015 4:37:05 AM PST by JoeProBono (SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING ’VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

now that’s funny

i just finished (i hope) some work on a project where that happened twice


75 posted on 12/19/2015 4:39:03 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPyes but now I must concentratc.;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trumping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: blam

Living near the terminus of the Ordovician glacier and looking around a bit causes me to believe that in “glacier terms,” the movement of surface debris is more like using a squeegee on a window than a broom in the dirt.


76 posted on 12/19/2015 4:49:27 AM PST by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: billorites
I don't see what the big deal is about moving the stones, they don't look that big when you see them up close.....

Video Evidence

77 posted on 12/19/2015 4:59:11 AM PST by machman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

My neck of the woods are littered with glacial erratics. Some are in the middle of broad, alluvial rich river valleys, some sit atop hills and mountains. It would make sense to use a glacial erratic that was already sitting atop a small rise on a plain. It would stick out like a sore thumb for nomadic hunters as a landmark, gathering place. Wouldn’t take long for some to get a belly fully of elk and a little bit of fermented juice and then next thing you know Thog says, “Hey, hold my leather flask. Watch this.” And soon it’s a drunken project.


78 posted on 12/19/2015 5:17:44 AM PST by Sirius Lee (Cruz or Lose 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
"I have always been under the impression the glaciers were a North-South thing."

At a global level of analysis that's true.

At a smaller scale, more local topographical features may be the major determinant of the direction of glacial advances/retreats.

79 posted on 12/19/2015 6:35:20 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

:’) The large ‘sarsen’ stones at Stonehenge were clearly carved under the supervision of a Type A personality. One of the lintel stones was begun on the ‘wrong’ side, and the big boss — whomever it was — made the workers change it, do it ‘right’. The problem was, they were partly done on the ‘wrong’ side, and there mistake survives.

Many more sites all over the place:

https://www.pinterest.com/JudithZiyal/megaliths-dolmen-menhirs-hunebedden/

Castlerigg, for instance:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CastleriggStoneCircle(SimonLedingham)Jul2005.jpg


80 posted on 12/20/2015 2:16:57 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson