Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush sneaking North American super-state without oversight?
WorldNet Daily ^ | June 13, 2006 | Jerome Corsi

Posted on 06/13/2006 6:08:39 AM PDT by conservativecorner

Despite having no authorization from Congress, the Bush administration has launched extensive working-group activity to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada.

The membership of the working groups has not been published, nor has their work product been disclosed, despite two years of massive effort within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

The groups, working under the North American Free Trade Association office in the Department of Commerce, are to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005.

This trilateral agreement, signed as a joint declaration not submitted to Congress for review, led to the creation of the SPP office within the Department of Commerce.

The SPP report to the heads of state of the U.S., Mexico and Canada, -- released June 27, 2005, -- lists some 20 different working groups spanning a wide variety of issues ranging from e-commerce, to aviation policy, to borders and immigration, involving the activity of multiple U.S. government agencies.

The working groups have produced a number of memorandums of understanding and trilateral declarations of agreement.

The Canadian government and the Mexican government each have SPP offices comparable to the U.S. office.

Geri Word, who heads the SPP office within the NAFTA office of the U.S. Department of Commerce affirmed to WND last Friday in a telephone interview that the membership of the working groups, as well as their work products, have not been published anywhere, including on the Internet.

Why the secrecy?

"We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public," said Word.

She suggested to WND that the work products of the working groups was described on the SPP website, so publishing the actual documents did not seem required.

WND can find no specific congressional legislation authorizing the SPP working groups. The closest to enabling legislation was introduced in the Senate by Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., on April 20, 2005. Listed as S. 853, the bill was titled "North American Cooperative Security Act: A bill to direct the Secretary of State to establish a program to bolster the mutual security and safety of the United States, Canada, and Mexico, and for other purposes." The bill never emerged from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

In the House of Representatives, the same bill was introduced by Rep. Katherine Harris, R-Fla., on May 26, 2005. Again, the bill languished in the House Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk Assessment.

WND cannot find any congressional committees taking charge for specific oversight of SPP activity.

WND has requested from Word in the U.S. Department of Commerce a complete listing of the contact persons and the participating membership for the working groups listed in the June 2005 SPP report to the trilateral leaders. In addition, WND asked to see all work products, such as memorandums of understanding, letters of intent, and trilateral agreements that are referenced in the report.

Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American Union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.

Referring to the SPP joint declaration, the report, entitled "Building a North American Community," stated:

The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly, and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The CFR task force report called for establishment of a common security border perimeter around North America by 2010, along with free movement of people, commerce and capital within North America, facilitated by the development of a North American Border Pass that would replace a U.S. passport for travel between the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

Also envisioned by the CFR task force report were a North American court, a North American inter-parliamentary group, a North American executive commission, a North American military defense command, a North American customs office and a North American development bank.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agenda; aheadinsandcantsee; americansellout; americo; amishdude; anewworldorderbush1; bildabetterbooger; blackhelicopters; bush; bushbash; bushbots; bushlovesfoxie; chickenlittle; corsi; cuespookymusic; cwojackson; duplicate; globalistsundermybed; ignrmanbehndcurtan; immigration; kookism; kooks; koolaid; lugar; morethorazineplease; namericanunion; nobordersnonation; northamericanunion; notthiscrapagain; paranoia; pitchforkers; preciousbodilyfluids; prosperity; spp; stupidhideheadinsand; tariff; tariffs; theboogeyman; tinfoil; tinfoilhats; trustmenotyoureyes; truthhurtsstupid; whirlednutdaily; wnd; worldnutdaily; yomomaundermybed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 321-340 next last
To: MikefromOhio

Paranoids...better then the old slinky toys.


81 posted on 06/13/2006 7:40:17 AM PDT by CWOJackson (Go Mike Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

Just as I thought. Someone else from the special little PING list who has nothing to say.


82 posted on 06/13/2006 7:40:25 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ActionNewsBill
Perhaps you could post an example of how you have been "threatened".

Did I say I'd been threatened on these threads? Reread what I said!! ActionNewsBill? Maybe you could do a story one how crazy you all sound. Maybe get a shrink in to diagnose your dementia or something.
83 posted on 06/13/2006 7:40:39 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - WTFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Clearly you're an expert on representative government. Lets get a definition to work from, ok? What is a working group?

Clearly you're an expert in kookiery. Maybe you could tell me how many Black Helicopters you've shot at?
84 posted on 06/13/2006 7:41:19 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - WTFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: badgerlandjim
I don't know how I became the point man on this!

Let me let you in on the big secret. Here we go:

There are meetings going on because the US doesn't want to deal with the terrorism consequences of lax Canadian and Mexican border security and to make trade agreements so we can get some of that sweet sweet Albertan crude. So they are having lobster dinners and listening to boring speeches so that they can get some of these things in place.

No grand conspiracy, no mega-state. But the Patsies can't scare people with NAFTA anymore, so it has to be bigger.

85 posted on 06/13/2006 7:41:19 AM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves AmishDude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

A working group was established. You're not disputing that are you? What is it?


86 posted on 06/13/2006 7:41:20 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

I admire your intellect. What is a working group?


87 posted on 06/13/2006 7:42:04 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

Threatened? We are all praying for you to make or have a point. LOL!


88 posted on 06/13/2006 7:42:13 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Just as I thought. Someone else from the special little PING list who has nothing to say.

Special little PING list? WTF are you talking about now? Another conspiracy? LOL!!!!!! You get laughed at a lot, don't you?
89 posted on 06/13/2006 7:42:16 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - WTFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
The port of entry will be moved to Kansas City...I suspect that new facility is under construction as well...

Nope. Des Moines. It's a sop to the French Canadians, donchaknow.

90 posted on 06/13/2006 7:42:37 AM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves AmishDude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
A working group was established. You're not disputing that are you? What is it?

What isn't in dispute is your craziness and your absolute entertainment value. LOL
91 posted on 06/13/2006 7:43:03 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - WTFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Threatened? We are all praying for you to make or have a point. LOL!

oh trust me, I'm sure it's coming if I keep up. Beyond that, JimRob was making fun of you nuts, that should REALLY say something.
92 posted on 06/13/2006 7:43:45 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - WTFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

What ping list? You mean the one in post #62?


93 posted on 06/13/2006 7:43:50 AM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves AmishDude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
LOL!!

It's too bad we don't have nut-grandmaster Farah weighing in on this.....
94 posted on 06/13/2006 7:44:21 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - WTFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
I admire your intellect. What is a working group?

I admire your insistent insanity. Mind telling me the last time you were on your meds?
95 posted on 06/13/2006 7:45:13 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - WTFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio
I mean, after all, I am sure there is a UN Army underneath the Denver Airport.

Of course. Where do you think the luggage goes?

96 posted on 06/13/2006 7:46:33 AM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves AmishDude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Slow down there Ben, as your spelling is a bit shaky just like the amnesty sham trying to be rammed down our throats.. LOL! You should of known that America should always be capitalized.

"There is legilation in congress to include central america."
97 posted on 06/13/2006 7:46:39 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio
What isn't in dispute is your craziness and your absolute entertainment value. LOL

Thanks for your thoughtful response. Now, what is a working group?
98 posted on 06/13/2006 7:47:14 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio
I admire your insistent insanity. Mind telling me the last time you were on your meds?

Its great to have civil discourse with a person of intellect. What is a working group? The article establishes that this is important. Lets get a definition we can use.
99 posted on 06/13/2006 7:49:04 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
"We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public,"

LET THEM EAT CAKE.

100 posted on 06/13/2006 7:49:38 AM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 321-340 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson