> her basic thesis - rhetoric aside - the the left uses these "propped up" self appointed spokespersons - widows, "war heroes" like Murtha, etc - to carry their message, so when they are counter attacked, the right can be accussed of attacking a "widow" or a "war hero" - is 100% correct.
Yes it is. But she had to go and ruin it by injecting that dumb "they're enjoying their husbands' deaths" and that the husbands were contemplating divorce and that the widows should pose for Playboy. Cheap shots worthy of a Dimocrat rant.
I agree with that.
No, a brilliant trap that suckered a number of Democrat journalists into outing themselves.
As you can see in my post #136, she's got 6 (+2) who lied about what she said to pump up their rant against her. Now, apparently, she's got Larry King, Dead, too (ref. oceanview's post #104).
That's the sick part right there. If the left can use her as the wacko example of all conservative women they will have a gold mine against us.
Ann makes conservative women look like trash. I resent her to the utmost. Get Melanie into the spotlight for God's sake. She is normal and sane....so that means the left won't promote her.
I wish the guys on FR would understand what this is doing to the image of conservative women. Ann has become an embarrassment.