Posted on 06/12/2006 5:35:00 PM PDT by EveningStar
At this point, Ann should expect to get some return fire.
LOL, thanks much.
Yes I am. But the guy who photo shopped that was dead on.
"I wish she'd go on Letterman and eviscerate that smarmy little pr*ck."
That smarmy prick at least has a sense to stay away from the meat grinder he would be entangled with in Ann Coulter.
That's basically spelled out in her book "How To Talk To A Liberal If You Must", and Rush has said the same thing. We all know the liberals hate the military, but in recent years, they've put in the forefront failures like Weasel Clark and John Kerry and bozo's like Murtha, who all believe that peace is acquired from negotiating with your sworn enemy who wants nothing more than you, me, and everyone else dead, or the chickensh!t strategy of cut and run.
IOW....Fake but accurate. ;)
VG, I agree with your point 100%
I don't find her to be very attractive.
Those who like a woman with the body of a 13 year old boy find her very attractive.
-- -- --
sink, I've tired of your week-long constant attacks on Coulter's writings, now you've developed homoerotic thoughts about her and are posting them to the world. You should take a breath and step away from the keyboard.
Malkin was on O'Reilly tonight, and said Coulter should not have used the language she used, though her taking on the 9/11 widows was correct.
I'm sure he's introduced as a Democrat every time he's on MSNBC. Not.
There are not many news junkies like us Freepers in the general population, VG. It's handy to be able to dismiss the other side out of hand by sticking a big fat DEMOCRAT label on their foreheads when they open their yaps.
Don't take it personally - pretty much everybody on FR is a n00b to me, VG. I'll roll over ten years next March. ;-)
LOL!! I'll take your nannyism under advisement.
Don't hold your breath.
Michelle is right on the money.
Coulter diluted her (valid) point about the widows by going ad hominem. But she'll sell a lot more books because of all the added publicity. Pretty cheap. And just a little sleazy.
> It's handy to be able to dismiss the other side out of hand by sticking a big fat DEMOCRAT label on their foreheads when they open their yaps.
I see where you're going. Except that since even some conservatives are unhappy with Coulter's latest ad hominem, I don't think these left-leaning pressbots are as exposed as you hope they are.
I think it's a hoot that they're lying about it. They've been in the business through the rise of the Internet and they still don't understand that LexisNexis is FOREVER.
Coulter said mean things, but she didn't lie about it.
This crowd just flat-out lied. Now they can be dismissed out of hand when they open their yaps about politics.
There's a reason the Republican Party is known as the Stupid Party...
Herding conservatives is like herding cats. Many conservative icons are like teenagers in some respects - they think that it can't happen to them.
I imagine Rush Limbaugh used to think like that...
She didn't go ad hominem, quit parroting the talking points of the Left.
Carlin is unhappy that he didn't get aborted?
Over the top, Sink. She deals in hyperbole, which the Left has marketed since the '60s. They want to sue her for stealing their intellectual property.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.