Replies

Yeah, but "they" want to ban "sniper rifles" (anything with a scope)...

140 posted on 06/12/2006 12:54:20 PM PDT by null and void (Thousands of geniuses live and die undiscovered -- either by themselves or by others)

To: null and void

Tough crap. That can't have any of mine.

They'll definately be doing a blood dance on this one whether the judge lives or dies. Watch for Josh Sugerbritches and his vile VPC crew try to make points with this one.

141 posted on 06/12/2006 12:56:15 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (It is not the oath that makes us believe the man, but the man the oath.- Aeschylus)

To: null and void

< < Yeah, but "they" want to ban "sniper rifles" > >

How about "sniper SHOTGUNS"???

Here's a recent ebay purchase he made:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=71135&item=7236649464

IF he bought that literature because he had the product (or was going to get one of them), and IF he was the shooter, and IF he hit the guy four times in the chest with it, and IF he was using slugs, then wow, that's got to smart.

For getting off four shots in rapid succession, that looks like it'd be the ideal platform. Doesn't look like there'd be much muzzle climb (barrel in-line with stock). If LHO could do 3 in a short lenght of time with what he was using, then surely a guy with THIS could get off 4 in short order.

340 posted on 06/13/2006 12:59:59 AM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794