Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: Marius3188
Lots of scientists become believers once they understand the precision and complexity of creation, from a galaxy to a cell.
To: Marius3188
But how did God create the human genome?
3 posted on
06/11/2006 9:56:11 PM PDT by
Dallas59
To: Marius3188; PatrickHenry
To: Marius3188
I thought he was going to say the genome was G-d. Steven Hawkings has made the statement that if he could find the unified law of physics he will have found G-d, meaning that physics is the replacement for G-d.
To: Marius3188
When you have for the first time in front of you this 3.1 billion-letter instruction book that conveys all kinds of information and all kinds of mystery about humankind, you cant survey that going through page after page without a sense of awe. I cant help but look at those pages and have a vague sense that this is giving me a glimpse of Gods mind.-Snip-
Collins believes that science cannot be used to refute the existence of God because it is confined to the natural world. In this light he believes miracles are a real possibility. If one is willing to accept the existence of God or some supernatural force outside nature then it is not a logical problem to admit that, occasionally, a supernatural force might stage an invasion, he says.
It looks like the good doctor has seen the error of apriori concluding that no supernatural forces can exist or intervene in our world. Instead just let the evidence lead to the logical conclusions. That is the essence of good research. Good for him.
6 posted on
06/11/2006 10:05:44 PM PDT by
DeweyCA
To: Marius3188
Wouldn't it be something if he announced he believed in Creation Science? That would send a lot of people here into spasms.
7 posted on
06/11/2006 10:05:44 PM PDT by
balch3
To: Marius3188
It is not uncommon for the scientist's faith to be strengthened by what he or she observes in research. I know that has been the case for me so far.
8 posted on
06/11/2006 10:06:29 PM PDT by
mysterio
To: Marius3188; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; curiosity; marron
PING! This one might prove to be interesting...
10 posted on
06/11/2006 10:12:10 PM PDT by
TXnMA
("Allah" = Satan in disguise)
To: Marius3188
yes yes... Fibonacci numbers, the frequency of the gods and all that.
Its all irrelevant unless you can answer 'what happened before'
13 posted on
06/11/2006 10:14:58 PM PDT by
FreedomNeocon
(Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
To: Marius3188
14 posted on
06/11/2006 10:15:22 PM PDT by
diamond6
(Everyone who is for abortion have been born. Ronald Reagan)
To: PatrickHenry
To: Marius3188
It is only logical.. God is the father of all science. He is the master arquitect, the ultimate scientists.
21 posted on
06/11/2006 10:25:06 PM PDT by
Cinnamon
To: Marius3188
Wow- scientist finds God. I bet that will be an interesting book. Looking foward to it.
23 posted on
06/11/2006 10:30:42 PM PDT by
Pajamajan
(Benedict Arnold and Jack Murtha served in the US military.)
To: Marius3188; devolve; ntnychik; PhilDragoo
24 posted on
06/11/2006 10:32:54 PM PDT by
potlatch
(Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
To: DaveLoneRanger
28 posted on
06/11/2006 10:37:17 PM PDT by
DannyTN
To: Marius3188
Watch how fast his fellows will shun and/or marginalize him now. And watch how fast the media will forget he ever existed.
To: Marius3188
"In further news, scientists worldwide declare genome scientist a quack, kick him out of their professional associations".
39 posted on
06/11/2006 10:54:45 PM PDT by
DesScorp
To: Marius3188
I see some DUmmie trolls are here today.
42 posted on
06/11/2006 10:59:36 PM PDT by
DesScorp
The only people who believe that science & religion are at war tend to be the atheists & secularists - not generally those who subscribe to intelligent design.
To: Marius3188
Sounds like an interesting guy.
Among Collinss most controversial beliefs is that of theistic evolution, which claims natural selection is the tool that God chose to create man. In his version of the theory, he argues that man will not evolve further.
Interesting, because in many ways intelligence (as possessed by humans) seems to nullify the effects of evolution. That is, we can "insulate" ourselves from the evolutionary tendency to adjust to environmental changes through the use of our intelligence. I wonder then if one could use that as some kind of rational argument for the notion that evolution (by in large) will stop with current humans, and thus humans as they exist were predestined by God?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson