To: doug from upland
I don't understand why she is attacking Rohrbacher who wants to reopen the investigation -- I would think that's what she would want too.
3 posted on
06/11/2006 9:02:14 PM PDT by
FairOpinion
(Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
To: FairOpinion
He will not get to the truth until he hears from her witnesses. He is looking at an old and worthless link to Andreas Strassmeir.
6 posted on
06/11/2006 9:05:00 PM PDT by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: FairOpinion
Rohrabacher isn't going to let any of Jayna Davis's research see the light of day in his hearings. His thrust its to invistigate possible collusion with "far-right-wing" groups in the bombing. Evidently there is a group from Oklahoma that is suspect.
Rohrabacher's hearings are a bogus grandstanding smokescreen.
Thats why Jayna Davis is going to nail him. Wish her good luck.
11 posted on
06/11/2006 9:19:22 PM PDT by
HardStarboard
(Hey, march some more - its helping get the wall built!)
To: FairOpinion
I don't understand why she is attacking Rohrbacher who wants to reopen the investigation -- I would think that's what she would want too. Those partisan-at-all-costs glasses of yours don't permit you to understand a lot of things.
23 posted on
06/11/2006 10:58:54 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
To: FairOpinion
The Rohrbacher inquiry is going to be a smokescreen.
"Nothing to see here folks, move along!"
"Why investigate again? The Murrah Bombing has been thoroughly investigated already!"
Just makes it so much harder to have a real investigation later.
52 posted on
06/12/2006 7:11:51 AM PDT by
Don Carlos
(Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to be happy. (B. Franklin))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson